On 08/04/2012 08:41 AM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Is there something I can do to fix that ? (the mount
option "recovery" didn't help here)
I've seen someone (perhaps Marc Merlin) report that the
3.5.x kernel was able to mount a filesystem that 3.4.x
couldn't, so it might be worth a shot here!
B
Hi Bo,
On 08/02/2012 12:13 PM, zhoubo wrote:
> From: Zhou Bo
>
> This patch enhances btrfs subvol list to show read-only snapshots.
> You can use the -r option showing read-only snapshots, for example:
> btrfs subvolume list -r
Please elaborate this sentence: if I read correctly your code, the
On 08/03/2012 04:43 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Mitch Harder
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> We need an smb_mb() before waitqueue_active to avoid missing wakeups.
>>> Before Mitch was hitting a deadlock between the ordered flushers
Hello,
I was playing with btrfs and accidentally formatted the disk directly
(/dev/sdb instead of sdb1). Since then I rewrote the GPT partition
table, recreated the partition and ran btrfs device scan. Still, btrfs
filesystem show prints:
root@horus /mnt # btrfs fi sh --all-devices
failed to read
Hallo, Florian,
Du meintest am 05.08.12:
> I was playing with btrfs and accidentally formatted the disk directly
> (/dev/sdb instead of sdb1). Since then I rewrote the GPT partition
> table, recreated the partition and ran btrfs device scan. Still,
> btrfs filesystem show prints:
> root@horus /m
Am Sonntag, 5. August 2012 schrieb Florian Lindner:
> Hello,
Hi Florian,
> I was playing with btrfs and accidentally formatted the disk directly
> (/dev/sdb instead of sdb1). Since then I rewrote the GPT partition
> table, recreated the partition and ran btrfs device scan. Still, btrfs
> filesyst
Am Sonntag, 5. August 2012 schrieb Florian Lindner:
> Hello,
Hi Florian,
> I was playing with btrfs and accidentally formatted the disk directly
> (/dev/sdb instead of sdb1). Since then I rewrote the GPT partition
> table, recreated the partition and ran btrfs device scan. Still, btrfs
> filesyst
On 05/08/2012 10:57, Chris Samuel wrote:
> On 08/04/2012 08:41 AM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
>
>> Is there something I can do to fix that ? (the mount
>> option "recovery" didn't help here)
>
> I've seen someone (perhaps Marc Merlin) report that the
> 3.5.x kernel was able to mount a filesystem tha
