Hi Eric,
thanks for reporting this. I sent a small patch series to the list
to fix this.
Sorry I forgot to CC you, will send the patches to you directly again.
It would be great if you could give it some testing.
Thanks,
Arne
On 15.01.2013 21:44, hop...@omnifarious.org wrote:
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/s
When destroying an active qgroup with qgroup destroy, the internal config will
become corrupt. This series adds 2 fixes: the first add a recovery, if the
config
is already corrupt, and the second prevents the destroy if it is still active.
Arne Jansen (2):
btrfs: ignore orphan qgroup relations
Currently you can just destroy a qgroup even though it is in use by other
qgroups
or has qgroups assigned to it. This patch prevents destruction of qgroups unless
they are completely unused. Otherwise destroy will return EBUSY.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen
---
fs/btrfs/q
If a qgroup that has still assignments is deleted by the user, the corresponding
relations are left in the tree. This leads to an unmountable filesystem.
With this patch, those relations are simple ignored.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen
---
fs/btrfs/qgroup.c |7 +++
Hello, Liu Bo.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:03:13AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> This adds a leak decoder callback so that slab destruction
> can use to generate debugging output for the allocated objects.
>
> Callers like btrfs are using their own leak tracking which will
> manage allocated objects in a
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 07:12:12PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:49:52AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Probably just related to whatever corruption it is you are seeing.
>
> So I have no corruption afterall, correct?
>
> That's good news, but then it does mean that uncle
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:31:22PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 07:12:12PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:49:52AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > Probably just related to whatever corruption it is you are seeing.
> >
> > So I have no corruption af
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
> As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
> The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs to grow this
> as well.
>
> Now we're able to fill the blank with thi
Hi,
please find attached a trivial patch for btrfs-progs. Likely not
strictly needed but I noticed valgrind complaining about
uninitialised memory in the ioctl call.
Regards,
Arvin
--
Arvin Schnell,
Senior Software Engineer, Research & Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Je
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:14:13PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> For the next time when you post btrfs-progs related patches, please
> indicate it with a suffix "Btrfs-progs: " on the subject.
And please add a Signed-off-by: line (no need to resend the patch).
david
--
To unsubscribe fr
Hi Chris,
please pull a few more fixes to the 0.20-rc series. I have reviewed and
verified them where possible. There are the long awaited ARM fixes, help
updates and unsorted code fixes.
git://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git for-chris
Based on top of master commit
91d9eec1ff044394f2
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47:21AM -0700, David Sterba wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> please pull a few more fixes to the 0.20-rc series. I have reviewed and
> verified them where possible. There are the long awaited ARM fixes, help
> updates and unsorted code fixes.
>
> git://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-un
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 17:25:19 +0530
Abhijit Pawar wrote:
> This patch replace the obsolete simple_strto with kstrto
>
The XFS part (or something like it) has been applied.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/v9fs.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int v9fs_parse_options(struct v9fs_session
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:42:46AM -0600, Mitch Harder wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> > This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
> > As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
> > The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 05:34:46PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Hello, Liu Bo.
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:03:13AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > This adds a leak decoder callback so that slab destruction
> > can use to generate debugging output for the allocated objects.
> >
> > Callers like btrfs a
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:20:57PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Liu Bo wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ struct kmem_cache {
> > gfp_t allocflags; /* gfp flags to use on each alloc */
> > int
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:34:38PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> On wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:03:13 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > This adds a leak decoder callback so that slab destruction
> > can use to generate debugging output for the allocated objects.
> >
> > Callers like btrfs are using their own leak track
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:42:46AM -0600, Mitch Harder wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
>> > This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
>> > As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
>> > The bala
18 matches
Mail list logo
