use the newer and more pleasant kstrtoul() to replace simple_strtoul(),
because simple_strtoul() is marked for obsoletion.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhen zhenzhang.zh...@huawei.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Zhang Zhen wrote:
use the newer and more pleasant kstrtoul() to replace simple_strtoul(),
because simple_strtoul() is marked for obsoletion.
[...]
- devid = simple_strtoull(devstr, end, 10);
+ devid = kstrtoul(devstr, end, 10);
kstrtoul
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is Mr. Agyemang Kwesi. I am the Proprietor of Kwesi Global
Limited. My office address is at NTHC Residential Area, Comm. 14,
Tema, Ghana. I am doing import/export business since 1998 with my
wife. We also represent some foreign companies in Ghana.
We found posts about
Hi Everyone
History:
I just recently discovered BtrFS. Well really only just started
reading a lot about it. Starting with blogs by Jim Salters and Marc
Merlin. So, thanks for those blogs guys.
This also introduced me to ZoL (ZFS). It seemed a bit more stable but
one of the features I really
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:40:03AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: doc: link btrfsck to btrfs-check
From: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: 2014年04月18日 22:48
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 08:47:28AM
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:12:54PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
But what came into my mind, wouldn't the following avoid such question in
future ? :
Yes and though it's a tiny change, I don't mind a patch for that.
} else {
/* ret 0 */
The comment is IMHO
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:40:15PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ cont:
break;
if (page_in_index + 1 = total_pages_in) {
- ret = -1;
+ ret =
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:12:54PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Adding the printk is probably a good thing, but I'd rather reconsider
using inode_cache at all. IMO it's supposed to fix problems with inode
numbers that we don't have.
IIRC, the problem is for the 32 bit system, were
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:16:19PM -0400, Zach Brown wrote:
uncompress_inline() is silently dropping an error from
btrfs_decompress() after testing it and zeroing the page that was
supposed to hold decompressed data. This can silently turn compressed
inline data in to zeros if decompression
On 05/10/2014 04:04 AM, Chris Samuel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Josef,
On Fri, 9 May 2014 01:22:27 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
Known problem, fixed in 3.15-rc1. Thanks,
Is the fix suitable for -stable too?
Unfortunately no, it's too big. I had thought about
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:11:56PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2014/05/11 11:52 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:10:41AM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
a) The chunk tree is whole and consistent
b) We need to (or have been asked to) rebuild the chunk tree from scratch
So I think, yes, you can make fake metadata blocks, but you have to
rely on either (a) your fake data being
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:00:23PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:16:19PM -0400, Zach Brown wrote:
uncompress_inline() is silently dropping an error from
btrfs_decompress() after testing it and zeroing the page that was
supposed to hold decompressed data. This can silently
Hi David,
On 05/12/2014 04:39 PM, David Sterba wrote:
Because most modern hardware is 64 bit (with the exception of ARM ?),
could be make sense to allow btrfs to work without inode_cache only on
64bit, loosing the possibility to be used on 32 bit system.
Instead when the inode_cache is
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 04:57:18PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 03:42:49PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I tried with 3.14.3 and it went further, however it died with
legolas:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# btrfs send home_ro.20140507_10:00:01 | btrfs
receive /mnt/btrfs_pool1/
At
On 2014/5/12 19:28, David Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Zhang Zhen wrote:
use the newer and more pleasant kstrtoul() to replace simple_strtoul(),
because simple_strtoul() is marked for obsoletion.
[...]
-devid = simple_strtoull(devstr, end, 10);
+devid =
use the newer and more pleasant kstrtoul() to replace simple_strtoul(),
because simple_strtoul() is marked for obsoletion.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhen zhenzhang.zh...@huawei.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Mon, 12 May 2014 20:18:04 +0200 as
excerpted:
Finally I have a question: it is possible to disable inode_cache ? what
means the flag noinode_cache ? It means disable the inode cache at
all, or only avoid to store on disk the inode cache ?
Unlike space_cache,
18 matches
Mail list logo
