Re: Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS

2014-06-14 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 06/14/2014 04:53 AM, Duncan wrote: > Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:19:31 +0200 as > excerpted: > >> On 06/13/2014 01:24 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:37:13PM +, Duncan wrote: FWIW, either 4 byte or 8 MiB fallocate calls would be bad, I

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove a leading '+'.

2014-06-14 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:46:25PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > -+ fprintf(stderr, "\t-F : attempt to dump superblocks with bad magic\n"); > > + fprintf(stderr, "\t-F : attempt to dump superblocks with bad magic\n"); > Whoa, git blame blames me, but that's not the patch I sent. ;) My mistak

Transaction commit: none (default)

2014-06-14 Thread Marc MERLIN
Taking snapshots is now output this in addition of the snapshot operation. Transaction commit: none (default) 1) Is that expected/normal? It looks kind of spamming/useless to me? 2) If it's useful, what's the use I'm not getting? Thanks, Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm y

Re: btrfs balance crash BUG ON fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1062 or RIP build_backref_tree+0x9fc/0xcc4

2014-06-14 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:40:07PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > I did a balance on a system that had 3.11 (yes, I know, it's old). It hung. > So, I rebooted with 3.13, and it failed in fs/btrfs/relocation > > Problem #1: I cannot stop the relocation. It starts on its own as soon as I > mount the FS

Re: Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS

2014-06-14 Thread Kai Krakow
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> schrieb: > As they say, "Whoosh!" > > At least here, I interpreted that remark as primarily sarcastic > commentary on the systemd devs' apparent attitude, which can be > (controversially) summarized as: "Systemd doesn't have problems because > it's perfect. Therefor

Re: Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS

2014-06-14 Thread Duncan
Kai Krakow posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:59:31 +0200 as excerpted: > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> schrieb: > >> As they say, "Whoosh!" >> >> At least here, I interpreted that remark as primarily sarcastic >> commentary on the systemd devs' apparent attitude, which can be >> (controversially) su

Re: Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS

2014-06-14 Thread Duncan
Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:52:39 +0200 as excerpted: > On 06/14/2014 04:53 AM, Duncan wrote: >> Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:19:31 +0200 as >> excerpted: >> >>> thanks for pointing that. However I am performing my tests on a fedora >>> 20 with systemd-2