Hi all,
I managed to get a test raid6 into a strange state after removing a drive that
was going faulty, putting in a blank replacement and then mounting with -o
degraded
uname -a
Linux urvile 4.1.7-v7+ #815 SMP PREEMPT Thu Sep 17 18:34:33 BST 2015 armv7l
GNU/Linux
btrfs --version
btrfs-progs
btrfs in v4.3-rc1 failed many xfstests items with '-o nospace_cache'
mount option.
Failed cases are:
btrfs/008,016,019,020,026,027,028,029,031,041,046,048,050,051,053,054,
077,083,084,087,092,094
generic/004,010,014,023,024,074,075,080,086,087,089,091,092,100,112,123,
124,125,126,127,131,133,1
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Zhao Lei wrote:
> btrfs in v4.3-rc1 failed many xfstests items with '-o nospace_cache'
> mount option.
>
> Failed cases are:
> btrfs/008,016,019,020,026,027,028,029,031,041,046,048,050,051,053,054,
> 077,083,084,087,092,094
Hi Zhao,
So far I tried a few of thos
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Zhao Lei wrote:
>> btrfs in v4.3-rc1 failed many xfstests items with '-o nospace_cache'
>> mount option.
>>
>> Failed cases are:
>> btrfs/008,016,019,020,026,027,028,029,031,041,046,048,050,051,053,054
I tried converting my root partition (originally ext4) to btrfs.
When I booted, I discovered that my root partition is getting
remounted as read only.
I tried to remount it with sudo mount -o remount,rw /
Didn't help. Caused some stuff to appear in dmesg though.
What do?
uname -a; btrfs --version
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:30:21PM +, Incorporeal Waffle wrote:
> I tried converting my root partition (originally ext4) to btrfs.
>
> When I booted, I discovered that my root partition is getting
> remounted as read only.
I'm afraid, last I heard, the ext4 convertion stuff was broken, and ha
Incorporeal Waffle posted on Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:30:21 + as excerpted:
> I tried converting my root partition (originally ext4) to btrfs.
There's some known bugs with btrfs-convert currently, with current or
very recent discussion on-list about how to fix it, if you check the
archives.
In
(Adding OP back to cc list -- I know from IRC they're not subscribed
to the list)
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:02:23PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Incorporeal Waffle posted on Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:30:21 + as excerpted:
>
> > I tried converting my root partition (originally ext4) to btrfs.
>
> There'
Goffredo Baroncelli writes:
> Hi Anand,
>
>
> On 2015-09-17 17:18, Anand Jain wrote:
>> it looks like -o degraded is going to be a very obvious feature,
>> I have plans of making it a default feature, and provide -o
>> nodegraded feature instead. Thanks for comments if any.
>>
>> Thanks, Anan
Gareth Pye writes:
> People tend to be looking at BTRFS for a guarantee that data doesn't
> die when hardware does. Defaults that defeat that shouldn't be used.
However, data is no more in danger at startup than it is at the moment
when btrfs notices a drive dropping, yet it permits IO to procee
Le 2015-09-20 13:14, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to show the codes of
"btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x388" ?
(Need kernel debuginfo)
My guess is the following line:(pretty sure, but not 100% sure)
--
/*
* only update s
Stéphane Lesimple wrote on 2015/09/22 03:30 +0200:
Le 2015-09-20 13:14, Stéphane Lesimple a écrit :
Le 2015-09-20 12:51, Qu Wenruo a écrit :
Would you please use gdb to show the codes of
"btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x388" ?
(Need kernel debuginfo)
My guess is the following line:(pretty sure,
Erkki Seppala posted on Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:35:39 +0300 as excerpted:
> Gareth Pye writes:
>
>> People tend to be looking at BTRFS for a guarantee that data doesn't
>> die when hardware does. Defaults that defeat that shouldn't be used.
>
> However, data is no more in danger at startup than it
On Friday 11 Sep 2015 09:38:43 Qu Wenruo wrote:
Qu, Sorry for the late response. My email client's filtering had broken and
hence I did not see your response until now.
> Hi Chandan,
>
> Although the reply may be a little late, but I think it's still better
> to fix the bug in mkfs.btrfs.
>
> T
14 matches
Mail list logo
