"btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
the implementation.
Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono
---
Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
On 2017年08月24日 15:39, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
"btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
the implementation.
Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono
---
Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 2 +-
1
The document of btrfs quota is missing figure 1.
I notice the body is copy of http://sensille.com/qgroups.pdf (whi
ch is linked from
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Quota_support), and insert the
figure.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono
---
Documentation/btrfs-quota.asciidoc | 18
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:23:38AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The block layer always remaps partitions before calling into the
> > ->make_request methods of drivers. Thus the call to get_start_sect in
> > in_chunk_boundary will
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 01:01:29PM -0400, jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
>From: Josef Bacik
>
>Right now we do a lot of weird hoops around outstanding_extents in order
>to keep the extent count consistent. This is because we logically
>transfer the outstanding_extent count from the initial reservati
From: Zhang Yu
[TEST/fuzz] case: 004-simple-dump-tree
Since the wrong key(DATA_RELOC_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 0) in root tree,
error calling print_chunk(), resulting in num_stripes == 0.
ERROR:
[TEST/fuzz] 004-simple-dump-tree
ctree.h:317: btrfs_chunk_item_size: BUG_ON `num_stripes == 0`
> I rebootet with HWE K4.11
>
> and took a pic of the error message (see attachment).
>
> It seems btrfs still sees the removed NVME.
> There is a mismatch from super_num_devices (3) to num_devices (2)
> with indicates something strage is going on here, imho.
>
> Then i returned and booted K4
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
> flush_epd_write_bio() sets bio->bi_ops by itself to honor REQ_SYNC,
> but it's not needed at all since bio->bi_ops has set up properly in
> both __extent_writepage() and write_one_eb(), and in the case of
> write_one_eb(), it also sets REQ_M
On 22.08.2017 23:00, jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik
>
> Nikolay reported that generic/273 was failing currently with ENOSPC.
> Turns out this is because we get to the point where the outstanding
> reservations are greater than the pinned space on the fs. This is a
> mistake, p
Hi,
we have one more fixup that stems from the blk_status_t conversion that did not
quite cover everything. The normal cases were not affected because the code is
0, but any error and retries could mix up new and old values. Please pull,
thanks.
--
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:17:00AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年08月16日 02:11, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > The mktables binary needs to be build with the host
> > compiler at built time, not the target compiler, because
> > it runs at build time to generate the raid tables.
> >
> > Copy auto
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 02:18:25PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> I found some btrfs commands options are not working because of
> inappropriate getopt_long() setting.
>
> This fixes "btrfs check -Q/-E"
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono
Patches 1-3 and the doc fix applied with some changelo
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:53PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> "btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
> the implementation.
> Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Is there a reason why a file should not be accepted? The ioctl supports
th
>> Using hundreds or thousands of snapshots is probably fine
>> mostly.
As I mentioned previously, with a link to the relevant email
describing the details, the real issue is reflinks/backrefs.
Usually subvolume and snapshots involve them.
> We find that typically apt is very slow on a machine wi
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:48:31PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> The document of btrfs quota is missing figure 1.
>
> I notice the body is copy of http://sensille.com/qgroups.pdf (whi
> ch is linked from
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Quota_support), and insert the
> figure.
>
> S
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 07:10:41AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
> > flush_epd_write_bio() sets bio->bi_ops by itself to honor REQ_SYNC,
> > but it's not needed at all since bio->bi_ops has set up properly in
> > both __extent_writepage()
> We find that typically apt is very slow on a machine with 50 or so snapshots
> and raid10. Slow as in probably 10x slower as doing the same update on a
> machine with 'single' and no snapshots.
>
> Other operations seem to be the same speed, especially disk benchmarks do not
> seem to indicate
At now while switch page bits in data ranges
we always hande +1 page, for cover case
where end of data range is not page aligned
Let's handle that case more obvious and efficient
Check end aligment directly and touch +1 page
only then needed
Signed-off-by: Timofey Titovets
---
fs/btrfs/extent_i
Op Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:40:54 +0300, schreef Marat Khalili:
>> We find that typically apt is very slow on a machine with 50 or so
>> snapshots and raid10. Slow as in probably 10x slower as doing the same
>> update on a machine with 'single' and no snapshots.
>>
>> Other operations seem to be the sa
On 2017年08月25日 01:01, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:17:00AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年08月16日 02:11, Eric Sandeen wrote:
The mktables binary needs to be build with the host
compiler at built time, not the target compiler, because
it runs at build time to generate the r
On 2017/08/25 2:37, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:53PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
"btrfs inspect-internal rootid " rejects a file to be specified in
the implementation.
Therefore change "file or directory" to "directory" in the doc.
Is there a reason why a file should n
On 8/24/17 12:01 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:17:00AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年08月16日 02:11, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> The mktables binary needs to be build with the host
>>> compiler at built time, not the target compiler, because
>>> it runs at build time to
This updates btrfs to use the helper wbc_to_write_flags which has been
applied in ext4/xfs/f2fs/block.
Please note that, with this, btrfs's dirty pages written by a
writeback job will carry the flag REQ_BACKGROUND, which is currently
used by writeback-throttle to determine whether it should go to
__del_reloc_root should be called before freeing up reloc_root->node.
If not, calling __del_reloc_root() dereference reloc_root->node, causing
the system BUG.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/rel
On 25.08.2017 08:15, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> __del_reloc_root should be called before freeing up reloc_root->node.
> If not, calling __del_reloc_root() dereference reloc_root->node, causing
> the system BUG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
This patch should also have:
Fixes: 6bdf131fac23 ("Btrf
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Ferry Toth wrote:
> Op Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:40:54 +0300, schreef Marat Khalili:
>
>>> We find that typically apt is very slow on a machine with 50 or so
>>> snapshots and raid10. Slow as in probably 10x slower as doing the same
>>> update on a machine with 'single'
On 25.08.2017 00:12, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> At now while switch page bits in data ranges
> we always hande +1 page, for cover case
> where end of data range is not page aligned
>
> Let's handle that case more obvious and efficient
> Check end aligment directly and touch +1 page
> only then ne
27 matches
Mail list logo
