Back in the day, before commit 0b246afa62b0 ("btrfs: root->fs_info
cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables") then we used to take
different locks. But now it's just one lock and the static checkers
think we can call down_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem); twice in a row which
would lead to a deadlock.
Hi,
I've setup a RAID1 with two disks (disk1 and disk2) and I'm testing the
btrfs replace command.
After replacing disk2 with disk3, I can only mount
(a) disk1 or disk3 (if both disk are plugged) and
(b) the original disk1 (degraded, if disk3 is unplugged).
I cannot mount the replacement disk
Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2019-02-08 13:10, waxhead wrote:
Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2019-02-07 13:53, waxhead wrote:
Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
So why do BTRFS hurry to mount itself even if devices are missing? and
if BTRFS still can mount , why whould it blindly accept a n
On 2019/2/9 下午6:36, Jakob Schöttl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've setup a RAID1 with two disks (disk1 and disk2) and I'm testing the
> btrfs replace command.
>
> After replacing disk2 with disk3, I can only mount
> (a) disk1 or disk3 (if both disk are plugged) and
> (b) the original disk1 (degraded, if d
Thanks Qu,
Am 09.02.19 um 13:16 schrieb Qu Wenruo:
On 2019/2/9 下午6:36, Jakob Schöttl wrote:
Hi,
I've setup a RAID1 with two disks (disk1 and disk2) and I'm testing the
btrfs replace command.
After replacing disk2 with disk3, I can only mount
(a) disk1 or disk3 (if both disk are plugged) and
(
09.02.2019 16:45, Jakob Schöttl пишет:
> Thanks Qu,
>
> Am 09.02.19 um 13:16 schrieb Qu Wenruo:
>> On 2019/2/9 下午6:36, Jakob Schöttl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've setup a RAID1 with two disks (disk1 and disk2) and I'm testing the
>>> btrfs replace command.
>>>
>>> After replacing disk2 with disk3, I
09.02.2019 13:36, Jakob Schöttl пишет:
> btrfs filesystem show # to get devid of device 2
Funny because for me it just says "Some devices missing" without giving
exact device id. May be has been fixed in recent versions but for a long
time it really annoyed me.
OK, when I just unplug device i
Am 09.02.19 um 16:32 schrieb Andrei Borzenkov:
Running
btrfs balance start -f -ssoft,convert=raid1 -dsoft,convert=raid1
-msoft,convert=raid1 /mnt
fixes it. I am not sure whether btrfs is expected to do it automatically
as of now.
This fix seems to work for me, too. Output was:
> Done, had t
I'm getting this error every time I mount and use my drive
[63046.831194] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 1953525167 512-byte logical blocks:
(1.00 TB/932 GiB)
[63047.049574] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[63047.054515] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 4f 00 00 00
[63047.060695] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write ca
Hi all,
I decided to try something a bit crazy, and try multi-device raid1 btrfs on
top of dm-crypt and bcache. That is:
btrfs -> dm-crypt -> bcache -> physical disks
I have a single cache device in front of 4 disks. Maybe this wasn't
that good of an idea, because the filesystem went read-on
10 matches
Mail list logo