Quoting Duncan (2013-08-17 01:02:45)
Tom Gundersen posted on Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:19:19 +0800 as excerpted:
I package btrfs-progs for Arch Linux, and I'm wondering about its
current status.
I have seen repeated talk of making regular releases, but so far we
haven't had a proper
Quoting Craig Johnson (2013-08-16 12:50:59)
I have a 4 device volume with raid5 - trying to remove one of the
devices (plenty of free space) and I get an almost immediate segfault.
Scrub shows no errors, repair show space cache invalid but nothing
else (I remounted with clear cache to be
I did this on 3.11-rc5 kernel I compiled a few days ago.
3.11.0-1-ARCH-00013-g584d88b-dirty.
Thanks!
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
Quoting Craig Johnson (2013-08-16 12:50:59)
I have a 4 device volume with raid5 - trying to remove one of the
This is a recent flag added to the restore command that allows
to restore xattrs. It was missing in the man page.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
---
NOTE: this patch is based on top of David Sterba's integration
branch integration-20130810.
man/btrfs.8.in |
Before this change, passing -O skinny-metadata to mkfs.btrfs would
only set the skinny metadata incompat flag in the super block after
the filesystem was created. This change makes mkfs.btrfs directly
create a filesystem with only skinny extents for metadata.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba
Before this change, passing -O skinny-metadata to mkfs.btrfs would
only set the skinny metadata incompat flag in the super block after
the filesystem was created. This change makes mkfs.btrfs directly
create a filesystem with only skinny extents for metadata.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba
On 2013-08-01 10:49, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:33:59 +0200, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
Hi all,
For some time, I've successfully deployed btrfs send/receive as a
viable backup solution.
It's fast and flexible and nicely scriptable =)
However, every once in a while, trouble strikes
Xavier Bassery xav...@bartica.org writes:
On 2013-08-01 10:49, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:33:59 +0200, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
Hi all,
For some time, I've successfully deployed btrfs send/receive as a
viable backup solution.
It's fast and flexible and nicely scriptable =)
I know the raid5 code is still new and being worked on, but I was
curious.
With md raid5, I can do this:
mdadm /dev/md7 --replace /dev/sde1
This is cool because it lets you replace a drive with bad sectors where
at least one other drive in the array has bad sectors, and the md layer
will read
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
The problem with the progs release is I keep finding more things I want
to add. My local git tree has about a dozen commits that I feel are
important enough for v1.0. I just have to cut it, the distros and
others
On 8/17/13 10:25 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
The problem with the progs release is I keep finding more things I want
to add. My local git tree has about a dozen commits that I feel are
important enough for v1.0. I just
11 matches
Mail list logo
