This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
using one core to compress.
Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
make this much faster
with multiple cores. This seems bad by my reading at least I would
recommend for writing compression
we write a
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Use backup superblocks if and only if
the first superblock is valid but corrupted.
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com
To: Chris Mason c...@fb.com, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
On 07/27/2014 08:29 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Use backup superblocks if and only if
the first superblock is valid but corrupted.
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com
To: Chris Mason c...@fb.com, Qu Wenruo
On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
using one core to compress.
Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
make this much faster
with multiple cores. This seems bad by my reading at least I
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
using one core to compress.
Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
make
Hey Josef,
Seems there are a lot of brtfs bugs open on the kernel Bugzilla. I am
new to the brtfs
side of development so please let me known if you want help cleaning
up some of the
bugs here that are actually valid and still open.
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
