On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:51:27PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
What I see critical is missing ./configure, because it's pretty ugly
to add hardcoded dependencies (e.g. libudev), there is also no checks
for another libs, Makefile
On Thu 27-11-14 15:19:54, Ted Tso wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 02:14:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
Looking into the code your patch I'd prefer to do something like:
* add support for I_DIRTY_TIME in __mark_inode_dirty() - update_time will
call __mark_inode_dirty() with this flag if any
On 25 November 2014 at 22:34, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 11/19/2014 7:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not a hard drive engineer, so I can't argue either point. But
consumer drives clearly do behave this way. On Linux, the kernel's
default 30 second command timer eventually
On 25 November 2014 at 23:14, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 11/19/2014 6:59 PM, Duncan wrote:
The paper specifically mentioned that it wasn't necessarily the
more expensive devices that were the best, either, but the ones
that faired best did tend to have longer device-ready times.
On Thu 27-11-14 18:00:16, Ted Tso wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 02:14:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
* change queue_io() to also call
moved += move_expired_inodes(wb-b_dirty_time, wb-b_io, time +
24hours)
For this you need to tweak move_expired_inodes() to take pointer to
On 11/27/2014 05:15 AM, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:19:05PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 11/25/2014 11:21 PM, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
However I still doesn't understood why you want btrfs-w/multiple disk
over LVM ?
I want to split a few disks into partitions, but I
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:39:56 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:02:23 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
The increase/decrease of bio counter is on
On 11/28/2014 09:05 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
For the disk autodetection, I still convinced that it is a sane default
to skip the lvm-snapshot
No... please don't...
Maybe offer an option to select between snapshots or no-snapshots but in
much the same way there is no _functional_
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 06:05:48PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 11/27/2014 05:15 AM, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
This is a weakness of the current udev and asynchronous device hotplug
concept: there is no notion of bus enumeration in progress, so we can be
trying to assemble multi-device
Chris Murphy posted on Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:10:40 -0700 as excerpted:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
So, umm... kinda late now, but read that copy as if it had a footnote
attached, saying Yes, I know it's not actual copy, it's two views of
the same thing
On 11/29/2014 02:25 AM, Robert White wrote:
On 11/28/2014 09:05 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
For the disk autodetection, I still convinced that it is a sane
default to skip the lvm-snapshot
No... please don't...
Maybe offer an option to select between snapshots or no-snapshots but
in
2014-11-29 2:25 GMT+01:00 Robert White rwh...@pobox.com:
On 11/28/2014 09:05 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
For the disk autodetection, I still convinced that it is a sane default
to skip the lvm-snapshot
No... please don't...
Maybe offer an option to select between snapshots or
On 11/28/2014 08:59 PM, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 06:05:48PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 11/27/2014 05:15 AM, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
This is a weakness of the current udev and asynchronous device hotplug
concept: there is no notion of bus enumeration in progress, so we
13 matches
Mail list logo
