Hi,
I have today added one device and I have converted metadata to raid1. Than I
wanted to convert to raid1 also some data (with balance filter) and try if
there is some speedup when reading files (starting programs)... I have issued
this command:
luvar@blackdawn:~$ sudo time btrfs balance
On 2014-12-31 12:27, ashf...@whisperpc.com wrote:
Phillip
I had a similar question a year or two ago (
specifically about raid10 ) so I both experimented and read the code
myself to find out. I was disappointed to find that it won't do
raid10 on 3 disks since the chunk metadata describes
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com wrote:
The subvol delete output has changed with btrfs-progs
-Delete subvolume 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap'
+Delete subvolume (no-commit): 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap'
make the matching changes in the xfstests btrfs 001.out
Hi Anand,
On 04/18/2011 09:37 AM, liubo wrote:
Modify command 'chattr' and 'lsattr' to support compress and cow.
- use 'C' to indicate NOCOW attribute.
It's kind of confusing for new users that when one sets
chattr +C someexistingfile
on btrfs, a subsequent
lsattr someexistingfile
will show the C flag
On 2015-01-02 12:45, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2015/01/02 15:42, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-12-31 12:27, ashf...@whisperpc.com wrote:
I see this as a CRITICAL design flaw. The reason for calling it
CRITICAL
is that System Administrators have been trained for 20 years that
RAID-10
can
On 2015/01/02 15:42, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-12-31 12:27, ashf...@whisperpc.com wrote:
I see this as a CRITICAL design flaw. The reason for calling it
CRITICAL
is that System Administrators have been trained for 20 years that
RAID-10
can usually handle a dual-disk failure, but the
On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 08:27:55PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Small problem with the rendering of this commit
d4ef1a06f8be623ae94e4d498c306e8dd1605bef, when I use 'man btrfs
filesystem' the above portion looks like this:
'K', 'M', 'G', 'T', 'P', or 'E\',
I'm not sure why there's a
Hi Khaled,
Could you give use more description about the problem this patch
is trying to solve? Maybe an example will help a lot to understand it.
Thanx
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Khaled Ahmed khaled@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Khaled Ahmed khaled@gmail.com
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't start a scrub because it is running, and can't cancel it
because it isn't running! How do I get out of this state? OS is
Ubuntu 14.10.
$ uname -r
3.16.0-28-generic
# btrfs scrub start .
ERROR: scrub is already running.
To cancel use 'btrfs
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 05:12:04PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 08:27:55PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Small problem with the rendering of this commit
d4ef1a06f8be623ae94e4d498c306e8dd1605bef, when I use 'man btrfs
filesystem' the above portion looks like this:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 03:54:55PM -0800, Roger Binns wrote:
I can't start a scrub because it is running, and can't cancel it
because it isn't running! How do I get out of this state? OS is
Ubuntu 14.10.
This has been fixed in btrfs-progs 3.16.2 by commit
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Just because I want a raid doesn't mean I need it to operate reliably
24x7. For that matter, it has long been established that power
cycling drives puts more wear and tear on them and as a general rule,
leaving them on 24x7
12 matches
Mail list logo
