On 2018年04月29日 09:55, David C. Partridge wrote:
> Not a problem
>
> See attached
The final binary dump:
# dd if= of=/tmp/copy1.img bs=1 count=16K skip=25942081536
# dd if= of=/tmp/copy2.img bs=1 count=16K skip=26478952448
Thanks,
Qu
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Qu Wenruo
On 2018年04月29日 04:16, Paul Richards wrote:
> On 28 April 2018 at 20:39, Patrik Lundquist
> wrote:
>> On 28 April 2018 at 20:54, Paul Richards wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I recently upgraded from Linux 4.4.0 to 4.13.0 (Ubuntu 16.04 stock to
>>>
On 2018年04月29日 00:02, David C. Partridge wrote:
> Here are the dumps you requested.
Sorry, I took wrong dump.
The correct dump would be:
# btrfs inspect dump-tree -t extent
And you still need to do an extra dump for the final offending tree block.
Considering the extra steps and delays,
On 2018年04月29日 01:45, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 06:42:06PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:24:25PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> fs_info can be extracted from btrfs_block_group_cache, and all
>>> btrfs_block_group_cache is created by
On 28 April 2018 at 20:39, Patrik Lundquist wrote:
> On 28 April 2018 at 20:54, Paul Richards wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I recently upgraded from Linux 4.4.0 to 4.13.0 (Ubuntu 16.04 stock to
>> hwe kernel).
>>
>> Since then, I've noticed lots of
Hi,
I recently upgraded from Linux 4.4.0 to 4.13.0 (Ubuntu 16.04 stock to
hwe kernel).
Since then, I've noticed lots of btrfs warnings in dmesg (example at
the end). I believe these warnings to be benign, and they relate to
my partition not being a multiple of 4KiB in size (I confirmed that
/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nikolay-Borisov/btrfs-Unexport-and-rename-btrfs_invalidate_inodes/20180428-234332
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 06:42:06PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:24:25PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > fs_info can be extracted from btrfs_block_group_cache, and all
> > btrfs_block_group_cache is created by btrfs_create_block_group_cache()
> > with fs_info initialized, no
/commits/ethanwu/btrfs-Take-trans-lock-before-access-running-trans-in-check_delayed_ref/20180428-223414
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:28:44PM -0400, Noah Massey wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:56 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:49PM -0400, je...@suse.com wrote:
> >> From: Jeff Mahoney
> >>
> >> Commit d2c609b834d6 (Btrfs: fix qgroup
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:32:14PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> On 4/27/18 12:40 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:02:13PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> +static void queue_rescan_worker(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> +{
> >>>
> >>> And this had to be moved upwards
/linux/commits/Nikolay-Borisov/btrfs-Unexport-and-rename-btrfs_invalidate_inodes/20180428-234332
config: i386-randconfig-a0-201816 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:24:25PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> fs_info can be extracted from btrfs_block_group_cache, and all
> btrfs_block_group_cache is created by btrfs_create_block_group_cache()
> with fs_info initialized, no need to worry about NULL pointer
> dereference.
Famous last words.
[
/linux/commits/Nikolay-Borisov/btrfs-Unexport-and-rename-btrfs_invalidate_inodes/20180428-234332
config: x86_64-randconfig-x013-201816 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors
Here are the dumps you requested.
-Original Message-
From: Qu Wenruo [mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com]
Sent: 28 April 2018 15:23
To: David C. Partridge; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with btrfs
On 2018年04月28日 22:06, David C. Partridge wrote:
> Here's the log you
/commits/ethanwu/btrfs-Take-trans-lock-before-access-running-trans-in-check_delayed_ref/20180428-223414
config: i386-randconfig-a0-201816 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All warnings
/ethanwu/btrfs-Take-trans-lock-before-access-running-trans-in-check_delayed_ref/20180428-223414
config: i386-randconfig-x014-201816 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new
On 2018年04月28日 22:06, David C. Partridge wrote:
> Here's the log you asked for ...
>
> David
To dump the offending tree block, you could use the following command:
# dd if=/dev/mapper/Charon--vg-root of=copy1.dump bs=1 count=16k
skip=22919544832
# dd if=/dev/mapper/Charon--vg-root
Here's the log you asked for ...
David
-Original Message-
From: Qu Wenruo [mailto:quwenruo.bt...@gmx.com]
Sent: 28 April 2018 14:54
To: David C. Partridge
Subject: Re: Problems with btrfs
On 2018年04月28日 21:38, David C. Partridge wrote:
> Oh! doing a private build from source a bit
To what level of btrfs-progs do you recommend I should upgrade once my
corrupt FS is fixed? What is the kernel pre-req for that?
Would prefer not to build from source ... currently running Ubuntu 16.04LTS
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
On 2018年04月28日 17:37, Michael Wade wrote:
> Hi Qu,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I will investigate upgrading the kernel,
> however I worry that future ReadyNAS firmware upgrades would fail on a
> newer kernel version (I don't have much linux experience so maybe my
> concerns are unfounded!?).
>
чт, 26 апр. 2018 г. в 16:44, David Sterba :
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:37:17AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> > Currently btrfs_inode have size equal 1136 bytes. (On x86_64).
> >
> > struct btrfs_inode store several vars releated to compression code,
> > all states use 1 or 2
Hi Qu,
Thanks for your reply. I will investigate upgrading the kernel,
however I worry that future ReadyNAS firmware upgrades would fail on a
newer kernel version (I don't have much linux experience so maybe my
concerns are unfounded!?).
I have attached the output of the dump super command.
I
чт, 26 апр. 2018 г. в 17:05, David Sterba :
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:37:14AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> > At now btrfs_dedupe_file_range() restricted to 16MiB range for
> > limit locking time and memory requirement for dedup ioctl()
> >
> > For too big input range code
On 2018年04月28日 16:30, Michael Wade wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was hoping that someone would be able to help me resolve the issues
> I am having with my ReadyNAS BTRFS volume. Basically my trouble
> started after a power cut, subsequently the volume would not mount.
> Here are the details of my
Hi all,
I was hoping that someone would be able to help me resolve the issues
I am having with my ReadyNAS BTRFS volume. Basically my trouble
started after a power cut, subsequently the volume would not mount.
Here are the details of my setup as it is at the moment:
uname -a
Linux QAI
On 04/28/2018 04:05 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2018年04月28日 01:41, Brendan Hide wrote:
Hey, all
I'm following up on the queries I had last week since I have installed
the NVMe SSD into the PCI-e adapter. I'm having difficulty knowing
whether or not I'm doing these benchmarks correctly.
As a
27 matches
Mail list logo