[PATCH] btrfs-progs: docs: add note about resizing to max after device replace

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Documentation/btrfs-replace.asciidoc | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-replace.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-replace.asciidoc index 5a14a40..61ab306 100644 --- a/Documentation/btrfs-replace.asciidoc +++ b

Re: btrfs-progs: initial scan-build results

2016-03-01 13:44 GMT+01:00 Holger Hoffstätte : > Hi, > > With btrfs-progs needing & getting some more love I decided to run today's > master through clang's very awesome static analyzer [1] to see what a more > complete data flow analysis than gcc's -Wall yields. The results can be > found at [2] a

[PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: copy btrfs-calc-size to inspect-internal tree-stats

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Makefile.in | 3 +- btrfs-calc-size.c | 482 +-- cmds-inspect-tree-stats.c | 506 ++ cmds-inspect-tree-stats.h | 26 +++ cmds-inspect.c

[PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: update docs and completion for tree-stats

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 10 ++ btrfs-completion | 2 +- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-inspect

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: docs: fix spelling errors

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Documentation/btrfs-balance.asciidoc | 4 ++-- Documentation/btrfs-device.asciidoc | 2 +- Documentation/btrfs-filesystem.asciidoc | 10 +- Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 2 +- Documentation/btrfs-man5

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: fix incorrect column order

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- cmds-fi-du.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cmds-fi-du.c b/cmds-fi-du.c index 6f3ef3d..2ffd917 100644 --- a/cmds-fi-du.c +++ b/cmds-fi-du.c @@ -505,8 +505,8 @@ static int du_add_file(const char *filename, int dirfd

Re: btrfs ways to travel back in time

2016-03-23 18:41 GMT+01:00 Vytautas D : > I can think of few ways to revert changes with btrfs, but I wonder > what are the trade-offs between each method and perhaps there is > already research done on this? > > ways to restore a snapshot ( post kernel 3.* ): > a) via set-default > 1. btrfs subvo

Re: RAID-1 refuses to balance large drive

2016-03-23 20:10 GMT+01:00 Brad Templeton : > It is Ubuntu wily, which is 4.2 and btrfs-progs 0.4. I will upgrade to > Xenial in April but probably not before, I don't have days to spend on > this. Is there a fairly safe ppa to pull 4.4 or 4.5? Use the mainline ppa: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~ke

Re: btrfs ways to travel back in time

2016-03-23 23:31 GMT+01:00 Vytautas D : > >> atime). Also, this might break some configurations not expecting the >> set-default method > > I have never seen this before. Can you extend on this or provide a link so i > can read more about such limitation? >> Ubuntu, for instance. Layout as /@ for

Re: Possible Raid Bug

2016-03-25 20:57 GMT+01:00 Patrik Lundquist : > On 25 March 2016 at 18:20, Stephen Williams wrote: >> >> Your information below was very helpful and I was able to recreate the >> Raid array. However my initial question still stands - What if the >> drives dies completely? I work in a Data center a

Re: btrfs filesystem du - Failed to lookup root id - Inappropriate ioctl for device

2016-03-27 22:26 GMT+02:00 Peter Becker : > Hi i found the descriped error in if i execute du with btrfs-progs > v4.5 with kernel v4.5. > > floyd@nas ~ $ sudo btrfs version > btrfs-progs v4.5 > > floyd@nas ~ $ uname -r > 4.5.0-040500-generic > > floyd@nas ~ $ sudo btrfs fi show > Label: 'RAID' uui

receive snapshot, complains about missing file

Hello, Kernel 4.4.x and progs 4.5.1 on both client/host. As the topic says, I noticed that my automatic backus stopped working a while back. The cause seems to be related to snapshot inconsistencies. WARNING: [btrfs send/receive] (send=/mnt/btrfs_pool/__snapshots/@home.20160404, receive=/srv/bac

Re: receive snapshot, complains about missing file

2016-04-29 22:17 GMT+02:00 Chris Murphy : > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Fougner > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Kernel 4.4.x and progs 4.5.1 on both client/host. >> >> As the topic says, I noticed that my automatic backus stopped working >> a wh

Re: receive snapshot, complains about missing file

2016-04-29 22:28 GMT+02:00 Chris Murphy : > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Alexander Fougner > wrote: >> 2016-04-29 22:17 GMT+02:00 Chris Murphy : >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Fougner >>> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>>

Re: receive snapshot, complains about missing file

Heh, sorry about the noise! 2016-04-29 22:28 GMT+02:00 Chris Murphy : > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Alexander Fougner > wrote: >> 2016-04-29 22:17 GMT+02:00 Chris Murphy : >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Fougner >>> wrote: >>>> Hel

Re: receive snapshot, complains about missing file

2016-04-30 12:49 GMT+02:00 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>: > Alexander Fougner posted on Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:28:34 +0200 as excerpted: > >>>>> Do scrub and btrfs check (no repair) complete without errors? >> >> Send side >> >> sudo btrfs

Re: receive snapshot, complains about missing file

2016-04-30 13:28 GMT+02:00 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>: > Alexander Fougner posted on Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:55:06 +0200 as excerpted: > >>>> Receive side only outputs this: >>>> sudo btrfs check -p /dev/sdc Couldn't open file system >>> &g

Re: 4.2.6: livelock in recovery (free_reloc_roots)?

at's a known bug, with patches working their way thru the system both > to provide a different alternative and to let btrfs device delete missing > work again, but IDR the specific status of those patches. Presumably > they'll be in 4.4, but I don't know if they made it i

[PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: update docs for inspect-internal dump-tree

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Documentation/btrfs-debug-tree.asciidoc | 7 +++ Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 26 ++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-debug-tree.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-debug

[PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: copy functionality of btrfs-debug-tree to inspect-internal subcommand

The long-term plan is to merge the features of standalone tools into the btrfs binary, reducing the number of shipped binaries. Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Makefile.in | 2 +- btrfs-debug-tree.c | 424 +--- cmds-inspect-dump

[PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: clean up unnecessary headers and move radix_tree_init()

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- btrfs-debug-tree.c | 13 ++--- cmds-inspect-dump-tree.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/btrfs-debug-tree.c b/btrfs-debug-tree.c index 057a715..d6e5a69 100644 --- a/btrfs-debug-tree.c +++ b/btrfs-debug

[PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: add completion for subcommand dump-tree

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- btrfs-completion | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/btrfs-completion b/btrfs-completion index a34191b..7631911 100644 --- a/btrfs-completion +++ b/btrfs-completion @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ _btrfs_mnts() COMPREPLY

[PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs-progs: update docs and completion for inspect-internal dump-tree

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Documentation/btrfs-debug-tree.asciidoc | 7 +++ Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 26 ++ btrfs-completion | 8 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs-progs: copy functionality of btrfs-debug-tree to inspect-internal subcommand

The long-term plan is to merge the features of standalone tools into the btrfs binary, reducing the number of shipped binaries. Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Makefile.in | 2 +- btrfs-debug-tree.c | 435 +--- cmds-inspect-dump

Re: Major HDD performance degradation on btrfs receive

2016-02-23 17:55 GMT+01:00 Nazar Mokrynskyi : >> > What is wrong with noatime,relatime? I'm using them for a long time as >> > good compromise in terms of performance. >> The one option ends up canceling the other, as they're both atime related >> options that say do different things. >> >> I'd hav

Re: Major HDD performance degradation on btrfs receive

bove. > Sincerely, Nazar Mokrynskyi > github.com/nazar-pc > Skype: nazar-pc > Diaspora: naza...@diaspora.mokrynskyi.com > Tox: > A9D95C9AA5F7A3ED75D83D0292E22ACE84BA40E912185939414475AF28FD2B2A5C8EF5261249 > > On 23.02.16 18:05, Alexander Fougner wrote: >> >> 201

[PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: introduce inspect-internal dump-super

The long-term plan is to merge the features of standalone tools into the btrfs binary, reducing the number of shipped binaries. Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Makefile.in | 3 +- btrfs-show-super.c| 520 +--- cmds-inspect

[PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: update docs for inspect-internal dump-super

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc | 38 +++ btrfs-completion | 2 +- 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-inspect-internal.asciidoc b

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: allow device deletion using 'missing' keyword again

Device deletion procedures ensures the device is a block device. This patch introduces 'missing' as keyword again, correctly passing it on to the kernel instead of complaining about 'missing' not being a block device. Signed-off-by: Alexander Fougner --- cmds-device.c | 2 +

Re: Resize doesnt work as expected

2016-05-28 22:32 GMT+02:00 Peter Becker : > Hello, i have found a small issue but i doesn't know if this is intended. > > Starting with a RAID 1 setup with 3 x 4GB devices. > If you replace one of this devices with a 2GB device and run "resize > max" nothing happens. >From manpages: "The devid can