On 02/25/2012 05:55 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
$ btrfs filesystem df /usr
Data: total=3.22GB, used=3.22GB
System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=4.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, DUP: total=896.00MB, used=251.62MB
Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
I don't know if that's useful or not.
On 02/26/2012 11:48 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On 12-02-26 02:37 PM, Daniel Lee wrote:
3.22GB + (896MB * 2) = 5GB
There's no mystery here, you're simply out of space.
Except the mystery that I had to expand the filesystem to something
between 20GB and 50GB in order to complete the
On 02/26/2012 12:05 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 12-02-26 02:52 PM, Daniel Lee wrote:
>> What's mysterious about that?
> What's mysterious about needing to grow the filesystem to over 20GB to
> unpack 10MB of (small, so yes, many) files?
>> When you shrink it
On 05/07/2012 10:52 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 07.05.12:
I'm just going back to ext4 - then one broken disk doesn't disturb
the contents of the other disks.
?! If you use raid0 one broken disk will always disturb the contents
of the other disks, that is what raid0
On 05/07/2012 01:21 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Daniel,
Du meintest am 07.05.12:
Yes - I know. But btrfs promises that I can add bigger disks and
delete smaller disks "on the fly". For something like a video
collection which will grow on and on an interesting feature. And
such a (big) coll
On 05/04/2014 12:24 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>
> Gotcha, thanks for confirming, so -m raid1 -d raid0 really only protects
> against metadata corruption or a single block loss, but otherwise if you
> lost a drive in a 2 drive raid0, you'll have lost more than just half
> your files.
>
>> The scenari
On 02/14/2014 03:04 AM, Axelle wrote:
> Hi Hugo,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> Unfortunately, I had also tried
>
> sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdc1 /samples
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc1,
>missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>In some
Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Lee wrote:
>> On 02/14/2014 03:04 AM, Axelle wrote:
>>> Hi Hugo,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your answer.
>>> Unfortunately, I had also tried
>>>
>>> sudo mount -o degraded /dev/sdc1 /samples
>>> mount: wro
d-only file system
>
> Regards
> Axelle
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Daniel Lee wrote:
>> On 02/14/2014 07:22 AM, Axelle wrote:
>>>> Did the crashed /dev/sdb have more than 1 partitions in your raid1
>>>> filesystem?
>>> No, only 1 - as far a
On 04/23/2014 06:19 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs
> in production?
>
> Marc
Netgear uses BTRFS as the filesystem in their refreshed ReadyNAS line.
They apparently use Oracle's linux distro so I assume they're relying on
them to
10 matches
Mail list logo
