Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-09-14 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:58:36PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:38:15AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Russell King > > > wrote: > > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:53:21AM -0400, Jo

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-11-15 Thread Heiko Carstens
y default] return !memcmp(uuid, empty_zero_page, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE); ^ In fact there seem to be two more incorrect usages in the kernel. The patch below is not really tested. >From c2a9d3a453629466f0528aacbc6cbecc4247cff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-11-15 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 02:42:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > Quoting Chris Mason (2013-11-15 07:21:31) > >> Quoting Heiko Carstens (2013-11-15 06:32:16) > >> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:19:52PM -0500,

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs

2013-11-18 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:36:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:57:23PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 02:42:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > I was just going to comment that > > > > > > +