Re: [lkp] [nfsd] b44061d0b9: BUG: Dentry ffff880027d7c540{i=1846f,n=0a} still in use (1) [unmount of btrfs vda]

2016-08-10 Thread Jeff Layton
>fh_export, dchild, fhp); > > - if (err) { > > - dput(dchild); > > + /* > > +  * We unconditionally drop our ref to dchild as fh_compose will have > > +  * already grabbed its own ref for it. > > +  */ > > + dput(dchild); > > + if (err

[PATCH v2 00/19] fs: rework and optimize i_version handling in filesystems

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton v2: - xfs should use inode_peek_iversion instead of inode_peek_iversion_raw - rework file_update_time patch - don't dirty inode when only S_ATIME is set and SB_LAZYTIME is enabled - better comments and documentation tl;dr: I think we can greatly reduce the cost of the

[PATCH v2 08/19] ext2: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/ext2/dir.c | 8 fs/ext2/super.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c index 987647986f47..c99f14fec3f3 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c +++ b/fs/ext2/dir.c @@ -92,7 +92,7

[PATCH v2 17/19] xfs: avoid setting XFS_ILOG_CORE if i_version doesn't need incrementing

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton If XFS_ILOG_CORE is already set then go ahead and increment it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c index b41a92d18140

[PATCH v2 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in btrfs_update_time if something was changed

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton At this point, we know that "now" and the file times may differ, and we suspect that the i_version has been flagged to be bumped. Attempt to bump the i_version, and only mark the inode dirty if that actually occurred or if one of the times was updated. Signed-of

[PATCH v2 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change, we can avoid incrementing the counter on writes, unless someone has queried for it since it was last incremented. If the a/c/mtime

[PATCH v2 16/19] fs: only set S_VERSION when updating times if necessary

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton We only really need to update i_version if someone has queried for it since we last incremented it. By doing that, we can avoid having to update the inode if the times haven't changed. If the times have changed, then we go ahead and forcibly increment the counter, unde

[PATCH v2 12/19] ocfs2: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 14 +++--- fs/ocfs2/inode.c| 2 +- fs/ocfs2/namei.c| 2 +- fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c

[PATCH v2 15/19] IMA: switch IMA over to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index c7e8db0ea4c0

[PATCH v2 14/19] xfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 5 +++-- fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c| 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions

[PATCH v2 13/19] ufs: use new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/ufs/dir.c | 8 fs/ufs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/ufs/super.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/dir.c b/fs/ufs/dir.c index 2edc1755b7c5..547c4d4c4db8 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/dir.c +++ b/fs/ufs/dir.c

Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 08:46 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > From: Jeff Layton > > For AFS, it's generally treated as an opaque value, so we use the > *_raw variants of the API here. > > Note that AFS has quite a different definition for this counter. AFS > only increments

[PATCH v2 11/19] nfsd: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Mostly just making sure we use the "get" wrappers so we know when it is being fetched for later use. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h index 43

[PATCH v2 10/19] nfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For NFS, we just use the "raw" API since the i_version is mostly managed by the server. The exception there is when the client holds a write delegation, but we only need to bump it once there anyway to handle CB_GETATTR. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfs/de

[PATCH v2 09/19] ext4: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o --- fs/ext4/dir.c| 8 fs/ext4/inline.c | 6 +++--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 12 fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 ++-- fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 4 ++-- 7

[PATCH v2 07/19] exofs: switch to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/exofs/dir.c | 8 fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exofs/dir.c b/fs/exofs/dir.c index 98233a97b7b8..36e314083b80 100644 --- a/fs/exofs/dir.c +++ b/fs/exofs/dir.c @@ -60,7

[PATCH v2 06/19] btrfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 6 -- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 -- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 5d73f79ded8b

[PATCH v2 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For AFS, it's generally treated as an opaque value, so we use the *_raw variants of the API here. Note that AFS has quite a different definition for this counter. AFS only increments it on changes to the data, not for the metadata. We'll need to reconcile that som

[PATCH v2 04/19] affs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 4 ++-- fs/affs/dir.c | 4 ++-- fs/affs/super.c| 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/affs/amigaffs.c b/fs/affs/amigaffs.c index 0f0e6925e97d..085a93bea1e2 100644 --- a/fs/affs

[PATCH v2 02/19] fs: don't take the i_lock in inode_inc_iversion

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton The rationale for taking the i_lock when incrementing this value is lost in antiquity. The readers of the field don't take it (at least not universally), so my assumption is that it was only done here to serialize incrementors. If that is indeed the case, then we can dro

[PATCH v2 03/19] fat: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/fat/dir.c | 2 +- fs/fat/inode.c | 8 fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 6 +++--- fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 20 ++-- 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c

[PATCH v2 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Add a documentation blob that explains what the i_version field is, how it is expected to work, and how it is currently implemented by various filesystems. We already have inode_inc_iversion. Add several other functions for manipulating and accessing the i_version counter. For

Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 11:18 -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > A few thoughts on AFS usage below which might impact a future revision > of the API. I hope they are useful. > > On 12/16/2017 8:49 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 08:46 -0500, Jeff

Re: [PATCH v2 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version

2017-12-16 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 09:37 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 08:46:38AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > Add a documentation blob that explains what the i_version field is, how > > it is expected to work, and how it is curre

[PATCH v3 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change, we can avoid incrementing the counter on writes, unless someone has queried for it since it was last incremented. If the a/c/mtime

[PATCH v3 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in btrfs_update_time if something was changed

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton At this point, we know that "now" and the file times may differ, and we suspect that the i_version has been flagged to be bumped. Attempt to bump the i_version, and only mark the inode dirty if that actually occurred or if one of the times was updated. Signed-of

[PATCH v3 16/19] fs: only set S_VERSION when updating times if necessary

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton We only really need to update i_version if someone has queried for it since we last incremented it. By doing that, we can avoid having to update the inode if the times haven't changed. If the times have changed, then we go ahead and forcibly increment the counter, unde

[PATCH v3 17/19] xfs: avoid setting XFS_ILOG_CORE if i_version doesn't need incrementing

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton If XFS_ILOG_CORE is already set then go ahead and increment it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c index 225544327c4f

[PATCH v3 12/19] ocfs2: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 15 --- fs/ocfs2/inode.c| 3 ++- fs/ocfs2/namei.c| 3 ++- fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2

[PATCH v3 15/19] IMA: switch IMA over to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 3 ++- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index c7e8db0ea4c0

[PATCH v3 13/19] ufs: use new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/ufs/dir.c | 9 + fs/ufs/inode.c | 3 ++- fs/ufs/super.c | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/dir.c b/fs/ufs/dir.c index 2edc1755b7c5..50dfce000864 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/dir.c +++ b/fs/ufs

[PATCH v3 09/19] ext4: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o --- fs/ext4/dir.c| 9 + fs/ext4/inline.c | 7 --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 13 + fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/namei.c | 5 +++-- fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 5 +++-- 7

[PATCH v3 11/19] nfsd: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Mostly just making sure we use the "get" wrappers so we know when it is being fetched for later use. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h index 43

[PATCH v3 14/19] xfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 7 +-- fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 5 +++-- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c| 3 ++- fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 3 ++- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 4 +++- 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7

[PATCH v3 10/19] nfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For NFS, we just use the "raw" API since the i_version is mostly managed by the server. The exception there is when the client holds a write delegation, but we only need to bump it once there anyway to handle CB_GETATTR. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfs/de

[PATCH v3 08/19] ext2: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext2/dir.c | 9 + fs/ext2/super.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c index 987647986f47..4111085a129f 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c +++ b/fs

[PATCH v3 06/19] btrfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 +-- fs/btrfs/file.c | 1 + fs/btrfs/inode.c | 7 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 1 + fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 +++- fs/btrfs/xattr.c | 1 + 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5

[PATCH v3 07/19] exofs: switch to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/exofs/dir.c | 9 + fs/exofs/super.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exofs/dir.c b/fs/exofs/dir.c index 98233a97b7b8..c5a53fcc43ea 100644 --- a/fs/exofs/dir.c +++ b/fs/exofs/dir.c @@ -31,6

[PATCH v3 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For AFS, it's generally treated as an opaque value, so we use the *_raw variants of the API here. Note that AFS has quite a different definition for this counter. AFS only increments it on changes to the data, not for the metadata. We'll need to reconcile that som

[PATCH v3 02/19] fs: don't take the i_lock in inode_inc_iversion

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton The rationale for taking the i_lock when incrementing this value is lost in antiquity. The readers of the field don't take it (at least not universally), so my assumption is that it was only done here to serialize incrementors. If that is indeed the case, then we can dro

[PATCH v3 04/19] affs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 5 +++-- fs/affs/dir.c | 5 +++-- fs/affs/super.c| 3 ++- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/affs/amigaffs.c b/fs/affs/amigaffs.c index 0f0e6925e97d..14a6c1b90c9f 100644 --- a/fs/affs

[PATCH v3 03/19] fat: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/fat/dir.c | 3 ++- fs/fat/inode.c | 9 + fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 7 --- fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 22 +++--- 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c

[PATCH v3 00/19] fs: rework and optimize i_version handling in filesystems

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton v3: - move i_version handling functions to new header file - document that the kernel-managed i_version implementation will appear to increase over time - fix inode_cmp_iversion to handle wraparound correctly v2: - xfs should use inode_peek_iversion instead of

[PATCH v3 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Add a documentation blob that explains what the i_version field is, how it is expected to work, and how it is currently implemented by various filesystems. We already have inode_inc_iversion. Add several other functions for manipulating and accessing the i_version counter. For

Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:34 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 18-12-17 10:11:56, Jeff Layton wrote: > > static inline bool > > inode_maybe_inc_iversion(struct inode *inode, bool force) > > { > > - atomic64_t *ivp = (atomic64_t *)&inode->i_

Re: [PATCH v3 16/19] fs: only set S_VERSION when updating times if necessary

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:07 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 18-12-17 10:11:53, Jeff Layton wrote: > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > We only really need to update i_version if someone has queried for it > > since we last incremented it. By doing that, we can avoid having

Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:11 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > From: Jeff Layton > > Add a documentation blob that explains what the i_version field is, how > it is expected to work, and how it is currently implemented by various > filesystems. > > We already have inode_inc_iversi

Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-18 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 12:36 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:22:20PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:34 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Mon 18-12-17 10:11:56, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > static inline bool > >

Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-19 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 10:29 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 18-12-17 12:22:20, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:34 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Mon 18-12-17 10:11:56, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > static inline bool > > > > inode_maybe_in

Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-20 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 09:07 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:35:20PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > [PATCH] SQUASH: add memory barriers around i_version accesses > > Why explicit memory barriers rather than annotating the operations > with the required sem

Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-21 Thread Jeff Layton
On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 17:41 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 20-12-17 09:03:06, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 09:07 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:35:20PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > [PATCH] SQUASH: add memory barr

[PATCH v4 02/19] fs: don't take the i_lock in inode_inc_iversion

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton The rationale for taking the i_lock when incrementing this value is lost in antiquity. The readers of the field don't take it (at least not universally), so my assumption is that it was only done here to serialize incrementors. If that is indeed the case, then we can dro

[PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change, we can avoid incrementing the counter on writes, unless someone has queried for it since it was last incremented. If the a/c/mtime

[PATCH v4 17/19] xfs: avoid setting XFS_ILOG_CORE if i_version doesn't need incrementing

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton If XFS_ILOG_CORE is already set then go ahead and increment it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c index 225544327c4f

[PATCH v4 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in btrfs_update_time if something was changed

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton At this point, we know that "now" and the file times may differ, and we suspect that the i_version has been flagged to be bumped. Attempt to bump the i_version, and only mark the inode dirty if that actually occurred or if one of the times was updated. Signed-of

[PATCH v4 16/19] fs: only set S_VERSION when updating times if necessary

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton We only really need to update i_version if someone has queried for it since we last incremented it. By doing that, we can avoid having to update the inode if the times haven't changed. If the times have changed, then we go ahead and forcibly increment the counter, unde

[PATCH v4 12/19] ocfs2: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 15 --- fs/ocfs2/inode.c| 3 ++- fs/ocfs2/namei.c| 3 ++- fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2

[PATCH v4 15/19] IMA: switch IMA over to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 3 ++- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index c7e8db0ea4c0

[PATCH v4 11/19] nfsd: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Mostly just making sure we use the "get" wrappers so we know when it is being fetched for later use. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h index 43

[PATCH v4 14/19] xfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 7 +-- fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 5 +++-- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c| 3 ++- fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 3 ++- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 4 +++- 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7

[PATCH v4 13/19] ufs: use new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/ufs/dir.c | 9 + fs/ufs/inode.c | 3 ++- fs/ufs/super.c | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/dir.c b/fs/ufs/dir.c index 2edc1755b7c5..50dfce000864 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/dir.c +++ b/fs/ufs

[PATCH v4 10/19] nfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For NFS, we just use the "raw" API since the i_version is mostly managed by the server. The exception there is when the client holds a write delegation, but we only need to bump it once there anyway to handle CB_GETATTR. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfs/de

[PATCH v4 04/19] affs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 5 +++-- fs/affs/dir.c | 5 +++-- fs/affs/super.c| 3 ++- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/affs/amigaffs.c b/fs/affs/amigaffs.c index 0f0e6925e97d..14a6c1b90c9f 100644 --- a/fs/affs

[PATCH v4 09/19] ext4: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o --- fs/ext4/dir.c| 9 + fs/ext4/inline.c | 7 --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 12 fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 ++-- fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 5 +++-- 7

[PATCH v4 08/19] ext2: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext2/dir.c | 9 + fs/ext2/super.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c index 987647986f47..4111085a129f 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c +++ b/fs

[PATCH v4 07/19] exofs: switch to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/exofs/dir.c | 9 + fs/exofs/super.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exofs/dir.c b/fs/exofs/dir.c index 98233a97b7b8..c5a53fcc43ea 100644 --- a/fs/exofs/dir.c +++ b/fs/exofs/dir.c @@ -31,6

[PATCH v4 06/19] btrfs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 +-- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 -- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 5d73f79ded8b

[PATCH v4 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For AFS, it's generally treated as an opaque value, so we use the *_raw variants of the API here. Note that AFS has quite a different definition for this counter. AFS only increments it on changes to the data, not for the metadata. We'll need to reconcile that som

[PATCH v4 03/19] fat: convert to new i_version API

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/fat/dir.c | 3 ++- fs/fat/inode.c | 9 + fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 7 --- fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 22 +++--- 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c

[PATCH v4 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Add a documentation blob that explains what the i_version field is, how it is expected to work, and how it is currently implemented by various filesystems. We already have inode_inc_iversion. Add several other functions for manipulating and accessing the i_version counter. For

[PATCH v4 00/19] fs: rework and optimize i_version handling in filesystems

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton v4: - fix SB_LAZYTIME handling in generic_update_time - add memory barriers to patch to convert i_version field to atomic64_t v3: - move i_version handling functions to new header file - document that the kernel-managed i_version implementation will appear to increase over

Re: [PATCH v4 01/19] fs: new API for handling inode->i_version

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 10:14 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22 2017, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > Add a documentation blob that explains what the i_version field is, how > > it is expected to work, and how it is currently implemen

Re: [PATCH v4 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:20 +, David Howells wrote: > Jeff Layton wrote: > > > Note that AFS has quite a different definition for this counter. AFS > > only increments it on changes to the data, not for the metadata. > > This also applies to AFS directories: crea

Re: [PATCH v4 16/19] fs: only set S_VERSION when updating times if necessary

2018-01-02 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:50 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 22-12-17 07:05:53, Jeff Layton wrote: > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > We only really need to update i_version if someone has queried for it > > since we last incremented it. By doing that, we can avoid having

Re: [PATCH v4 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in btrfs_update_time if something was changed

2018-01-03 Thread Jeff Layton
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:05 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > From: Jeff Layton > > At this point, we know that "now" and the file times may differ, and we > suspect that the i_version has been flagged to be bumped. Attempt to > bump the i_version, and only mark the ino

Re: [PATCH v4 12/19] ocfs2: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-04 Thread Jeff Layton
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:05 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > From: Jeff Layton > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara > --- > fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 15 --- > fs/ocfs2/inode.c| 3 ++- > fs/ocfs2/namei.c| 3 ++- > f

Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-08 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 13:44 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > From: Jeff Layton > > > > Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that > > fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is

Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-08 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 14:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 13:44 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > From: Jeff

Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-08 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 05:30 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:05:56AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > + cur = inode_peek_iversion_raw(inode); > > + for (;;) { > > + /* If flag is clear then we needn't do anything */ > >

Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-08 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 18:29 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:29:24AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 14:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > On

Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-08 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:33 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:00:19PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 18:29 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > (...) > > > > > Ok, thanks. If you're seeing hangs then that mi

Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-08 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 14:15 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:33 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:00:19PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 18:29 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > (...)

Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-08 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 21:17 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 02:15:29PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:33 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:00:19PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > &g

[PATCH v5 19/19] fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change, we can avoid incrementing the counter on writes, unless someone has queried for it since it was last incremented. If the a/c/mtime

[PATCH v5 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in btrfs_update_time if something was changed

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton At this point, we know that "now" and the file times may differ, and we suspect that the i_version has been flagged to be bumped. Attempt to bump the i_version, and only mark the inode dirty if that actually occurred or if one of the times was updated. Signed-of

[PATCH v5 16/19] fs: only set S_VERSION when updating times if necessary

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton We only really need to update i_version if someone has queried for it since we last incremented it. By doing that, we can avoid having to update the inode if the times haven't changed. If the times have changed, then we go ahead and forcibly increment the counter, unde

[PATCH v5 17/19] xfs: avoid setting XFS_ILOG_CORE if i_version doesn't need incrementing

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton If XFS_ILOG_CORE is already set then go ahead and increment it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong --- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c b/fs/xfs

[PATCH v5 14/19] xfs: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 7 +-- fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 5 +++-- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c| 3 ++- fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 3 ++- fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 4 +++- 5 files changed

[PATCH v5 12/19] ocfs2: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 15 --- fs/ocfs2/inode.c| 3 ++- fs/ocfs2/namei.c| 3 ++- fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2

[PATCH v5 15/19] IMA: switch IMA over to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 3 ++- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index c7e8db0ea4c0

[PATCH v5 11/19] nfsd: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Mostly just making sure we use the "get" wrappers so we know when it is being fetched for later use. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h index 43

[PATCH v5 13/19] ufs: use new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/ufs/dir.c | 9 + fs/ufs/inode.c | 3 ++- fs/ufs/super.c | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/dir.c b/fs/ufs/dir.c index 2edc1755b7c5..50dfce000864 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/dir.c +++ b/fs/ufs

[PATCH v5 10/19] nfs: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For NFS, we just use the "raw" API since the i_version is mostly managed by the server. The exception there is when the client holds a write delegation, but we only need to bump it once there anyway to handle CB_GETATTR. Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Signed-of

[PATCH v5 09/19] ext4: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o --- fs/ext4/dir.c| 9 + fs/ext4/inline.c | 7 --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 12 fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 ++-- fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 5 +++-- 7

[PATCH v5 07/19] exofs: switch to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/exofs/dir.c | 9 + fs/exofs/super.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exofs/dir.c b/fs/exofs/dir.c index 98233a97b7b8..c5a53fcc43ea 100644 --- a/fs/exofs/dir.c +++ b/fs/exofs/dir.c @@ -31,6

[PATCH v5 08/19] ext2: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext2/dir.c | 9 + fs/ext2/super.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c index 987647986f47..4111085a129f 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c +++ b/fs

[PATCH v5 06/19] btrfs: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 +-- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 -- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed

[PATCH v5 05/19] afs: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton For AFS, it's generally treated as an opaque value, so we use the *_raw variants of the API here. Note that AFS has quite a different definition for this counter. AFS only increments it on changes to the data to the data in regular files and contents of the directories.

[PATCH v5 04/19] affs: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 5 +++-- fs/affs/dir.c | 5 +++-- fs/affs/super.c| 3 ++- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/affs/amigaffs.c b/fs/affs/amigaffs.c index 0f0e6925e97d..14a6c1b90c9f 100644 --- a/fs/affs

[PATCH v5 03/19] fat: convert to new i_version API

2018-01-09 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/fat/dir.c | 3 ++- fs/fat/inode.c | 9 + fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 7 --- fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 22 +++--- 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c

  1   2   3   4   5   >