On 09/07/2011 02:31 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
Is it a bug? or Am I missing something?
You need to run this before mounting the devices:
# btrfs device scan
Thank you, it works by executing device scan.
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body
On 09/07/2011 12:37 PM, cwillu wrote:
1. Create and format two images, the 1st in 400Mbytes, and 2nd in 286Mbytes.
root@pibroch:/btrfs-progs# ls -lh /usr/src/linux-3.0/img*
-rw-r--r-- 1 jeff jeff 400M 2011-09-07 12:00 /usr/src/linux-3.0/img0
-rw-r--r-- 1 jeff jeff 286M 2011-09-07 12:00 /usr/src/
On 09/08/2011 01:32 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Jeff Liu wrote:
On 09/07/2011 12:37 PM, cwillu wrote:
1. Create and format two images, the 1st in 400Mbytes, and 2nd in
286Mbytes.
root@pibroch:/btrfs-progs# ls -lh /usr/src/linux-3.0/img*
-rw-r--r-- 1 jeff
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 15634d4..16f31e1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(
On 09/14/2011 01:40 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> 14:06, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu
>>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/super.c | 10 --
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 15634d4..16f31e1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int btrfs_parse_early_options(c
Add CC to Coreutils, cp --reflink performs btrfs clone operation.
Thanks,
-Jeff
On 09/15/2011 07:43 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:25:36PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> The dst file will have the same inode flags with dst file after
>> file clone, and I think it's unexpected.
>>
I once posted a similar patch for this issue which can be found at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12169.html
with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
mutex_unlo
Hi Andreas and Andi,
Thanks for your comments.
On 09/18/2011 09:46 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
>>> file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
>>>
>>>if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
>>>mutex_unl
在 2011-9-18，下午4:42， Marco Stornelli 写道：
> Il 18/09/2011 09:29, Jeff Liu ha scritto:
>> Hi Andreas and Andi,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>> On 09/18/2011 09:46 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>>>> with an additional improvement if the of
Hi Leonidas,
On 10/11/2011 03:35 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Is there a small script to test if TRIM is working on my system?
Zefan has replied a similar question at below link, hope it could be
useful to you.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/13018
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
