Re: BTRFS constantly reports "No space left on device" even with a huge unallocated space

willing to try that, will a successful rebalance with 4.8 fix a filesystem, or is the recommended way still "backup, format, restore, lose all snapshots"? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don&

Re: Is stability a joke? (wiki updated)

Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49

"not a btrfs filesystem"

on with this file system? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by

Re: "not a btrfs filesystem"

s Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421 -

Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

ng '/mnt/fanbtr': No space left on device mh@fan:~$ What is going on here? How do I get away from here? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:15:21AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > On Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 22:14:50 CET Marc Haber wrote: > > I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing > > (with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable): > > >

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:22:45AM +, Hugo Mills wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 01:08:29AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > Why wouldn't btrfs allocate more data chunks from the ample free space? > >It's a bug. It's been around for years (literally), but nobody

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

Hi, On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:56:58AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Marc Haber wrote on 2016/02/27 22:14 +0100: > >I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing > >(with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable): > > > >mh@fan:~$ sudo btrf

balance hangs and starts again on reboot

. btrfs balance cancel just hangs around with no visible reaction for hours. Log appended. Is there rescue? Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leime

Re: balance hangs and starts again on reboot

Hi Chris, I apologize for not being able to deliver logs in the way you might find them more helpful. On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:08:10PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > I have another btrfs on the same host that has no the no s

Re: balance hangs and starts again on reboot

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:09:39PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 03/04/16 18:31, Marc Haber wrote: > > I have another btrfs on the same host that has no the no space left on > > device balance issue, but on another disk. On this btrfs, it seems > > like a balance pro

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

ger. Just don't do it; setup your thinning schedule so your peak is > 3000 snapshots per filesystem or under, and you won't have that problem > to worry about. =:^) That needs to be documented prominently. Ths ZFS fanbois will love that. > Oh, and btrfs quota management exacerb

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

te.ubuntu.com/15292589/ has another log of mine with btrfs fi usage calls as well, just in case this helps. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fo

Re: balance hangs and starts again on reboot

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 04:38:57PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 03/05/16 15:17, Marc Haber wrote: > >> Then try to balance in small increments. > > > > -dusage=5 and incrementing? Or what do you mean with "in small > > increments"? > > Exa

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

the filesystem > because there's no practical way yet to migrate so many snapshots to a > new file system. I am now back to a mid three-digit number of snapshots. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:43:46AM +, Duncan wrote: > Marc Haber posted on Sat, 05 Mar 2016 21:09:09 +0100 as excerpted: > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Something is happening with the usage of this file system that's out of > &g

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

you want? If it is not, please state what you mean by "not trimmed" as I only removed those clutter messages from the logs I sent. Greetings Marc [1] Does RHEL 6 have btrfs in the first place? -- - Marc Haber

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

increase it. The idea is to reproduce the bug. ... losing another pile of snapshots in the process? This is a productive machine[1]. Greetings Marc [1] yes, with off-line backups being made -- ----- Marc Haber |

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > So understanding the usage is important to figuring out what's > > happening. I'd file a bug and include as much information on how the >

btrfs-image run time

Is that expeced behavior? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordi

Re: btrfs-image run time

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:27:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > how long is btrfs-image taking to run on a 400 GiB filesystem? > > I have /bin/btrfs-image -s -t 8 -s /dev/mapper/mydevice - | pixz -9 > > file.on.other.fs running for four hours now Strike my question please, I didn&#

Re: btrfs-image run time

ed for that. btrfs-image behaves as documented, everything else was a problem existing between chair and keyboard. Sorry for the noise. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

ticularly bad about > kernel versioning Just to get back to this thread's subject, I am using Debian unstable, with a vanilla kernel, 4.4.3 at the beginning of this thread, and 4.4.4 today. Greetings Marc -- ----- Ma

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

using > the proper flags to blot out the filenames for privacy. And what > btrfs-progs tools were used to create this file system. Etc. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114451 Please advise if there is something missing. Greetings Marc -- -----

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

hat finishs without ENOSPC, but no visible decrease of total Metadata size. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose thin

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

hat? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

tem mounted with > enospc_debug, that might be useful for a developer? The later logs I posted were actually taken with enospc_debug, the 4.4.3 ones even with Duncan's patch. I think I didn't apply it before building 4.4.4. Greetings Marc -- -----

New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

em, block device and storage relevant log lines were left in. Is there anything missing? Is this the same issue? Would the log help as addition in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114451? Greetings Marc --

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:17:24AM +1100, Andrew Vaughan wrote: > On 13 March 2016 at 22:58, Marc Haber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> The alternative if this can't be fixed, is to recreate the filesyste

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Something is happening with the usage of this file system that's out > >>

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:14:45PM +0100, Henk Slager wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> The alternative if this can't be fixed, is to recreate

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 05:12:35PM +, Duncan wrote: > Marc Haber posted on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:58:10 +0100 as excerpted: > > I see the same metadata spread as with the old filesystem in btrfs fi > > df, > > totl at 23 and used at 2.38 GiB. What I find strange is that th

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

it, thanks. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421 -- To unsubscribe

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:58:09PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:34:09PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > The alternative if this can't be fixed, is to recreate the filesystem > > because there's no practical way yet to migrate so many snapshots

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

Hi Henk, On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:46:54PM +0100, Henk Slager wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > Mar 14 10:23:49 fan mh: BEGIN btrfs-balance script > > Mar 14 10:23:49 fan mh: btrfs fi df / > > Mar 14 10:23:49 fan root: Data, single: total

Re: New file system with same issue

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:48:18PM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 03/14/16 13:07, Marc Haber wrote: > >> And btrfs balance runs into the same ENOSPC issues as the old one: > > > > ... with Qu's patch, I now get a reproducible kernel trace: > > > >

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

an device size Couldn't open file system [23/521]mh@fan:~$ df -h > Maybe btrfs check --repair can also fix it, but before doing --repair > or other actions, I would see what else besides btrfs could be wrong, > see also suggestion of Holger. Like putting the filesystem on an unencry

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

oking at "ofanbtr" after I changed the subject to avoid mixing up both instances. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| los

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:00:13AM +0100, Henk Slager wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > Yes, I want to keep the possibility to remove huge files from > > snapshots that shouldnt have been on a snapshotted volume in the first > > place wit

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:15:33PM +0100, Henk Slager wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Henk Slager wrote: > >> The other question is: What is mounted on /media/tempdisk/ ? > > > > Th

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:05:46PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > [10/509]mh@fan:~$ sudo btrfs check /media/tempdisk/ > Superblock bytenr is larger than device size > Couldn't open file system > [11/509]mh@fan:~$ After umounting and btrfs check the block device, things seem to be f

Re: New file system with same issue (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:29:32PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > After umounting and btrfs check the block device, things seem to be > fine now But, umounting the btrfs seemed to trigger the following kernel traces: Mar 15 14:21:30 fan kernel: [92308.377104] [ cut here ]--

Re: New file system with same issue

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:52:30AM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 03/14/16 21:13, Marc Haber wrote: > > Do I need to wait for clear_cache to finish, like until I see disk > > usage dropping? > > The cache isn't that big, so you won't see a huge drop. Just us

Re: New file system with same issue

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:54:06AM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2016-03-15 09:46, Marc Haber wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:52:30AM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > >>On 03/14/16 21:13, Marc Haber wrote: > >>>Do I need to wait for clear_cache to

Current state of old filesystem (was: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work)

6 11:38:40 fan root: Mar 26 11:38:40 fan root: System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB Mar 26 11:38:40 fan root:/dev/mapper/ofanbtr#011 64.00MiB Mar 26 11:38:40 fan root: Mar 26 11:38:40 fan root: Unallocated: Mar 26 11:38:40 fan root:/dev/mapper/ofanbtr#011 182.94GiB Mar 26 11:38:40 fan m

"bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

in btrfs check --repair, or is this all a userspace matter? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder |

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:37:14PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I have a btrfs which btrfs check --repair doesn't fix: > > # btrfs check --repair /dev/mapper/fanbtr > bad metadata [4425377054720, 4425377071104) crossing stripe boundary > bad metadata [4425380134912, 4425380151

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

what I wanted to read on this filesystem. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 16

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

, which unfortunately hasn't released since November 2014 and is still with kernel 3.16 Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| los

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

:37:08 fan kernel: [ 429.488724] [] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6d Mar 22 22:37:08 fan kernel: [ 429.488725] ---[ end trace 63ee8891bd9de879 ]--- Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't tr

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 08:43:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:35:32PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > > As far as what the kernel is involved with, the easy way to check is if it's > > operating on a mounted filesystem or not. If it only

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

lt from > this. This basically means that I am ripe for a new mkfs.btrfs, right? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose thi

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:00:19PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Marc Haber wrote on 2016/03/29 08:43 +0200: > >On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:35:32PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > >>Did you convert this filesystem from ext4 (or ext3)? > > > >No. > > > >&

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

nism" rc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 16

How to cancel btrfs balance on unmounted filesystem

. Is there any possiblity to cancel the pending balance without mounting the fs first? I have also filed https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115581 to adress this in a more elegant way. Greetings Marc -- - Marc

Re: How to cancel btrfs balance on unmounted filesystem

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:01:37PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:21:12 +0200 > Marc Haber wrote: > > the balance restarts immediately after mounting > > You can use the skip_balance mount option to prevent that. Thanks. I now have this in all fstabs

Re: bad metadata crossing stripe boundary

6 /dev/dm-31 No, the filesystem was not converted, it was directly created as btrfs, and no, I didn't try mounting it. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailad

Re: bad metadata crossing stripe boundary

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:16:30PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:00:04 +0200 > schrieb Marc Haber : > > I find it somewhere between funny and disturbing that the first call > > of btrfs check made my kernel log the following: > > Mar 31 22:45:36 fan ker

Re: "bad metadata" not fixed by btrfs repair

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:42:46PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote: > So also false alerts. btrfs-tools 4.5.1 with Qu's patch from patchwork doesnt show those warnings any more. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber

Another ENOSPC situation

EC reports that Thermal Table has changed Apr 1 11:16:39 swivel kernel: [249949.723795] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready This btrfs is ripe for the backup-format-restore procedure, right? Greetings Marc -- ------

Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:14:50PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > I have again the issue of no space left on device while rebalancing > (with btrfs-tools 4.4.1 on kernel 4.4.2 on Debian unstable): just for the record: The host started acting up in more and more interesting ways, and after a c

Re: Another ENOSPC situation

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > btrfs balance -mprofiles seems to do something. one kworked and one > > btrfs-transaction process hog one CPU core each for hours, while > > blocking th

Re: Another ENOSPC situation

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:30:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Marc Haber > > wrote: > > > btrfs balance -mprofiles seems to do something. one kworked and one > > >

Re: Another ENOSPC situation

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:30:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Henk Slager wrote: > >> > On Fri, A

Re: bad metadata crossing stripe boundary

On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:57:25 +0200 > schrieb Marc Haber : > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:16:30PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > > > Am Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:00:04 +0200 > > > schrieb Marc Haber : > > >

Re: bad metadata crossing stripe boundary

On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 08:31:17PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:44:32 +0200 > schrieb Marc Haber : > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > > > Am Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:57:25 +0200 > > > schrieb Marc Haber : > >

Re: bad metadata crossing stripe boundary

On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:41:53PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Marc Haber > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:16:30PM +0200, Kai Krakow wrote: > >> Am Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:00:04 +0200 > >> schrieb Marc Haber : > >>

btrfs won't mount any more

opinions about what has happened here and how to avoid things like that in the future. Do more recently created btrfs filesystems have safeguards against damage that may occur when a filesystem fills up? Greetings Marc -- ----

Re: btrfs won't mount any more

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:15:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:15:31AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > I have wrecked another btrfs file system, probably for good this time. > > > > It's a 80 GB filesystem from 2015, in my secondary notebook, on

Re: btrfs won't mount any more

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:15:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Ouch, this is generally harmless unless your disk lies about barriers. > > Btrfs absolutely depends on them, and tends to suffer catastrophic > >

Re: btrfs won't mount any more

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I do have a dd copy of the device now. > > $ sudo losetup --find --show ./dropbtr0.btrfs > $ sudo mount -o skip_balance -t btrfs /dev/loop0 /mnt/tempdisk > > does immediately result in: > > Apr 12 22:37:48 f

"disk full" on a 5 GB btrfs filesystem, FAQ outdated?

solve this more elegantly? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fa

Re: "disk full" on a 5 GB btrfs filesystem, FAQ outdated?

Hi Hugo, On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 02:18:06PM +, Hugo Mills wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 02:07:54PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > However, the FAQ > > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Help.21_Btrfs_claims_I.27m_out_of_space.2C_but_it_looks_like_I_should_ha

Re: "disk full" on a 5 GB btrfs filesystem, FAQ outdated?

lear to me now. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany| lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to

Transaction aborted (error -17) during balance

ug symbols installed after this log extrct was obtained. Is there a tool which can help to make this trace useable? Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen

Re: "No space left on device" and balance doesn't work

> running longterm. What kind of work is being done to address this major usability issue? What is the timeframe for a fix? Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Maila

Re: Recommended why to use btrfs for production?

e in raid6, and to > have it replicated each night to another btrfs server for "backup" of > the backup, how should we then install btrfs? Do you plan to use Snapshots? How many of them? Greetings Marc -- -----

Re: btrfs filesystem keeps allocating new chunks for no apparent reason

whether this changes btrfs' allocation behavior. I have never looked at apt's pdiff stuff in detail, but I guess that it creates many tiny temporary files. Greetings Marc -- ----- Marc Haber | "I don't