Hello
Recently I am learning about the Btrfs.
My requirement is to construct a cross-device btrfs volume consisting
of a single SSD and many (much larger) HDDs. The tricky part is that
I want the SSD to be dedicated to metadata since SSDs are much faster
(and more expensive) than HDDs and metada
her HDDs are meaningless. Is that acceptable?
>
> regards,
> wengang.
> On 10-07-28 17:32, wks1986 wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Recently I am learning about the Btrfs.
>>
>> My requirement is to construct a cross-device btrfs volume consisting
>> of a single SS
Hello
I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault.
[r...@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6
WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6
nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sector
I found this in the wiki page
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Getting_started :
Note: to be mounted the subvolume or snapshot have to be in the root
of the btrfs filesystem.
But is this an intentional requirement or just a known bug?
Thanks
Kunshan Wang
2010/8/4 wks1986 :
> Hello
&g