Chris Mason wrote:
On 09/11/2016 04:55 AM, Waxhead wrote:
I have been following BTRFS for years and have recently been starting to
use BTRFS more and more and as always BTRFS' stability is a hot topic.
Some says that BTRFS is a dead end research project while others claim
the opposite.
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 11. September 2016, 10:55:21 CEST schrieb Waxhead:
I have been following BTRFS for years and have recently been starting to
use BTRFS more and more and as always BTRFS' stability is a hot topic.
Some says that BTRFS is a dead end research project while
Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote:
Hi,
as I wrote today in IRCI experienced an issue with 'btrfs filesystem
usage'.
I have a 4 partitions RAID10 btrfs filesystem almost full.
'btrfs filesystem usage' reports wrong "Unallocated" indications.
Linux 4.5.3
btrfs-progs v4.5.3
# btrfs fi usage /data/
Duncan wrote:
Austin S Hemmelgarn posted on Wed, 04 Nov 2015 13:45:37 -0500 as
excerpted:
On 2015-11-04 13:01, Janos Toth F. wrote:
But the worst part is that there are some ISO files which were
seemingly copied without errors but their external checksums (the one
which I can calculate with
Stefan Behrens wrote:
On 1/26/2012 9:59 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:27:57AM +0100, Waxhead wrote:
[...]
Will BTRFS try to repair the corrupt data or will it simply silently
restore the data without the user knowing that a file has been
fixed?
No, it'll just return
cwillu wrote:
So if I for example edit a text file three times and store it I can get the
following.
Version1: I currently like cheese
Version2: I currently like onions
Version3: I currently like apples
As far as I understand a disk corruption might result in me suddenly liking
onions (or even
