Hello,
I get the following WARNING while de-duplicating with bedup 0.10.1. I am
running Debian with backports kernel:
Linux lithium 4.17.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.17.8-1~bpo9+1
(2018-07-23) x86_64 GNU/Linux
I ran:
sudo bedup scan /media/btrfs/
sudo bedup dedupe /media/btrfs/
From: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:46:12 +
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode
is at least as redundant as the data mode. For example give warning
when:
-dconvert
.
Changes in v2
Use btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:43:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem
.
Changes in v2
Use btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:43:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem
On 05/10/15 03:33, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> Sam,
>
> On 10/03/2015 11:50 PM, sam tygier wrote:
>> Currently BTRFS allows you to make bad choices of data and
>> metadata levels. For example -d raid1 -m raid0 means you can
>> only use half your total disk space, but will
btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:43:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode
is at least
On 16/09/15 11:15, Zhao Lei wrote:
> Hi, sam tygier
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of sam tygier
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:42 PM
>> To: linux-btrf
a warning was
considered sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 18:13:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode
sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Sam Tygier <samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 18:13:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode
is at least as redundant
start -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
this will result in a filesystem with raid1:dup, which will not
survive the loss of one drive. I personally don't see why the tools
should allow this, but in the previous thread a warning was
considered sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk
From: Sam
is at least
as redundant as the data mode. For example give warning when:
-d raid1 -m raid0
V1 - V2 Downgrade from error to warning as requested by David
Sterba.
Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk
From fdfcb5f733ff5ed48562366bda6f1a9c740b031a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam
On 10/03/13 15:43, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
- DUP - dD (to allow more that 2 copy per
disk)
- RAID1 - nC or *C
- RAID0 - mS or *S
- RAID10 - nCmS or *CmS or nC*s
-
On 09/03/13 20:31, Hugo Mills wrote:
Some time ago, and occasionally since, we've discussed altering the
RAID-n terminology to change it to an nCmSpP format, where n is the
number of copies, m is the number of (data) devices in a stripe per copy,
and p is the number of parity devices in a
Hi,
I recently got into a stick situation because i had a btrfs volume with data in
raid1 but metadata as dup. when i removed one of the drives i could not mount
as degraded. This was my error as i did not convert the metadata when i
converted it from a single/dup volume.
But i wonder if there
On 25/10/12 22:37, Kyle Gates wrote:
On 22/10/12 10:07, sam tygier wrote:
hi,
I have a 2 drive btrfs raid set up. It was created first with a single
drive, and then adding a second and doing
btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /data
the original drive is showing smart errors so i want
On 22/10/12 10:07, sam tygier wrote:
hi,
I have a 2 drive btrfs raid set up. It was created first with a single drive,
and then adding a second and doing
btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /data
the original drive is showing smart errors so i want to replace it. i dont
easily have
hi,
I have a 2 drive btrfs raid set up. It was created first with a single drive,
and then adding a second and doing
btrfs fi balance start -dconvert=raid1 /data
the original drive is showing smart errors so i want to replace it. i dont
easily have space in my desktop for an extra disk, so i
On 01/05/12 20:35, Martin wrote:
The idea is to gain the random access speed of the SSDs but have the
HDDs as backup in case the SSDs fail due to wear...
Have you looked at the bcache project http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/
sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
18 matches
Mail list logo
