On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:28:35PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:56:54AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Apparently 512mb was too small, with a fs_mark command we could get so much
delayed work built up that we'd never trip the lets commit the transaction
logic until we'd gotten
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:56:54AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Apparently 512mb was too small, with a fs_mark command we could get so much
delayed work built up that we'd never trip the lets commit the transaction
logic until we'd gotten too much delayed refs built up. Increasing this to 1
gig
Apparently 512mb was too small, with a fs_mark command we could get so much
delayed work built up that we'd never trip the lets commit the transaction
logic until we'd gotten too much delayed refs built up. Increasing this to 1
gig makes us much safer and we no longer abort with Dave's fs_mark
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:56:54AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Apparently 512mb was too small, with a fs_mark command we could get so much
delayed work built up that we'd never trip the lets commit the transaction
logic until we'd gotten too much delayed refs built up. Increasing this to 1
gig
