On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:31:14AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Thanks　for the test case.
> It would be better if you could submit a test case for it.
Yeah I'll handle this.
> Reproduced the problem. I'll track it down.
> Seems to be related with metadata.
Thanks, please CC me on any patches.
At 06/01/2016 08:50 AM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:48:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Mark Fasheh wrote on 2016/05/26 17:18 -0700:
The btrfs balance operation is significantly slower when qgroups are
enabled. To the best of my knowledge, a balance shouldn't have an effect
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:48:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Mark Fasheh wrote on 2016/05/26 17:18 -0700:
> >The btrfs balance operation is significantly slower when qgroups are
> >enabled. To the best of my knowledge, a balance shouldn't have an effect on
> >qgroups counts (extents are not
Mark Fasheh wrote on 2016/05/26 17:18 -0700:
The btrfs balance operation is significantly slower when qgroups are
enabled. To the best of my knowledge, a balance shouldn't have an effect on
qgroups counts (extents are not changing between subvolumes), so we don't
need to actually run the
The btrfs balance operation is significantly slower when qgroups are
enabled. To the best of my knowledge, a balance shouldn't have an effect on
qgroups counts (extents are not changing between subvolumes), so we don't
need to actually run the qgroup code when we balance.
Since there's only one
