In btrfs the block size (called sector size in btrfs) can not be
smaller then the page size. Therefore skip block sizes smaller
then page size if the fs is btrfs, so that the test can succeed
on btrfs (testing only with block sizes of 4kb on systems with a
page size of 4Kb).
Signed-off-by: Filipe
Hi Filipe,
(2014/06/23 19:28), Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
In btrfs the block size (called sector size in btrfs) can not be
smaller then the page size. Therefore skip block sizes smaller
then page size if the fs is btrfs, so that the test can succeed
on btrfs (testing only with block
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Satoru Takeuchi
takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Filipe,
(2014/06/23 19:28), Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
In btrfs the block size (called sector size in btrfs) can not be
smaller then the page size. Therefore skip block sizes smaller
then page
Hi Filipe,
(2014/06/23 19:55), Filipe David Manana wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Satoru Takeuchi
takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Filipe,
(2014/06/23 19:28), Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
In btrfs the block size (called sector size in btrfs) can not be
smaller then the
Not subscribed to fstests so not sure if this will reach that mailing
list...
I feel Takeuchi's instincts are right, even if the analysis *may* be
wrong. As is it looks like there should be a btrfs) selector inside the
case.
On 23/06/14 12:48, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
Hi Filipe,
(2014/06/23
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:28:00 +0100
From: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
To: fste...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] generic/017: skip
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:35:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner lczer...@redhat.com
To: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
Cc: fste...@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/017: skip invalid block sizes
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/017: skip invalid block sizes for btrfs
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:28:00 +0100
From: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
To: fste...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:28:00AM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
In btrfs the block size (called sector size in btrfs) can not be
smaller then the page size.
Nor larger.
commit 8d082fb727ac11930ea20bf1612e334ea7c2b697
Author: Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: Tue Apr 3 09:56:53
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/017: skip invalid block sizes for btrfs
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:28:00 +0100
From: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
To: fste...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:28:00 +0100
Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com wrote:
In btrfs the block size (called sector size in btrfs) can not be
smaller then the page size.
Just in case anyone misses this, there is some work to address this limitation:
Cc: fste...@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/017: skip invalid block sizes for btrfs
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:28:00 +0100
From: Filipe David Borba Manana fdman...@gmail.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
