Re: [PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device

2016-08-03 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:37:55PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > This test uses the scratch device, so cycle that, not the test dev. > > This is also a xfs_fsr test, so put it in the fsr group. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong

Re: [PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device

2016-08-03 Thread Eryu Guan
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > This test uses the scratch device, so cycle that, not the test dev. > This is also a xfs_fsr test, so put it in the fsr group. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > --- > tests/xfs/128 |7 --- >

Re: [PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device

2016-08-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > This test uses the scratch device, so cycle that, not the test dev. > This is also a xfs_fsr test, so put it in the fsr group. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Christoph

[PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device

2016-07-21 Thread Darrick J. Wong
This test uses the scratch device, so cycle that, not the test dev. This is also a xfs_fsr test, so put it in the fsr group. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong --- tests/xfs/128 |7 --- tests/xfs/group |2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)