On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:19:18PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 05:14:54PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 4:53 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Josef Bacik
> > >
> > > When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
>
On 12/1/18 1:19 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/12/1 上午12:52, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> From: Josef Bacik
>>
>> When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
>> changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
>> bug.
>
> May I ask under which case
On 2018/12/1 上午12:52, Josef Bacik wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik
>
> When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
> changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
> bug.
May I ask under which case we're going to modify an unlinked snapshot?
Maybe
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 05:14:54PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 4:53 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
> >
> > From: Josef Bacik
> >
> > When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
> > changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 4:53 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> From: Josef Bacik
>
> When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
> changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
> bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
>
From: Josef Bacik
When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
verify my theory. It is never correct to modify the snapshot once
