On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:25:02PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
But according to the dmesg, which is expired now though, I made the
following assumption:
There is a possibility that out of order execution made the work-wq =
wq sentence executed behind the queue_work() call,
and the
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:51:59 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:25:02PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
But according to the dmesg, which is expired now though, I made the
following assumption:
There is a possibility that out of order execution made the work-wq =
wq sentence executed
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:35:04 +0800
, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On fri, 20 Dec 2013 05:30:48 -0800, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
I'm sorry but I failed to reproduce the problem.
Btrfs/012 in xfstests has been run for serveral hours but nothing
happened.
Would you
On fri, 20 Dec 2013 05:30:48 -0800, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
I'm sorry but I failed to reproduce the problem.
Btrfs/012 in xfstests has been run for serveral hours but nothing
happened.
Would you please give me some more details about the environment or
On 12/19/2013 07:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
I'm sorry but I failed to reproduce the problem.
Btrfs/012 in xfstests has been run for serveral hours but nothing
happened.
Would you please give me some more details about the environment or
the panic backtrace?
Ok so it wasn't that test, it
I got a panic with btrfs/012 in the worker stuff. I'm bisecting it down
to figure out which patch introduced it but I'm afraid it may just be
one of the replace blah with btrfs_workqueue patches and not be super
helpful. You may want to run it in a loop or something and see if you
can
Thanks for reporting.
That's interesting, I'll look into it to figure out what's happening.
Qu
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:27:22 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
I got a panic with btrfs/012 in the worker stuff. I'm bisecting it
down to figure out which patch introduced it but I'm afraid it may
just
I'm sorry but I failed to reproduce the problem.
Btrfs/012 in xfstests has been run for serveral hours but nothing happened.
Would you please give me some more details about the environment or the
panic backtrace?
Thanks.
Qu
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:27:22 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
I got a
Add a new btrfs_workqueue_struct which use kernel workqueue to implement
most of the original btrfs_workers, to replace btrfs_workers.
With this patchset, redundant workqueue codes are replaced with kernel
workqueue infrastructure, which not only reduces the code size but also the
effort to
