On 9 September 2015 at 09:07, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On 9 September 2015 at 03:35, Anand Jain wrote:
> > There is a patch set to handle this..
> > 'Btrfs: introduce function to handle device offline'
>
> I'll have a look
So from my very quick
On 9 September 2015 at 03:35, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 03:34 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Currently i have a raid1 configuration on two disks where one of them
>>> is failing.
>>>
>>>
On 8 September 2015 at 21:43, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On 8 September 2015 at 21:34, Hugo Mills wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
[--8<--]
>>Physically removing it is the way to go (or disabling it using echo
>>
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On 8 September 2015 at 21:55, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>> On 8 September 2015 at 21:43, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>>> On 8 September 2015 at 21:34, Hugo Mills wrote:
On 8 September 2015 at 22:17, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>> On 8 September 2015 at 22:08, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Ian Kumlien
On 8 September 2015 at 21:34, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently i have a raid1 configuration on two disks where one of them
>> is failing.
>>
>> But since:
>> btrfs fi df /mnt/disk/
>> Data, RAID1:
Hi,
Currently i have a raid1 configuration on two disks where one of them
is failing.
But since:
btrfs fi df /mnt/disk/
Data, RAID1: total=858.00GiB, used=638.16GiB
Data, single: total=1.00GiB, used=256.00KiB
System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=132.00KiB
Metadata, RAID1: total=4.00GiB,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently i have a raid1 configuration on two disks where one of them
> is failing.
>
> But since:
> btrfs fi df /mnt/disk/
> Data, RAID1: total=858.00GiB, used=638.16GiB
> Data, single: total=1.00GiB, used=256.00KiB
>
On 8 September 2015 at 21:55, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On 8 September 2015 at 21:43, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>> On 8 September 2015 at 21:34, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> [--8<--]
>
On 8 September 2015 at 22:08, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
[--8<--]
>> Someone thought they were done too early, only one disk => read only
>> mount. But, readonly mount => no balance.
>>
>> I think
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On 8 September 2015 at 22:08, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> [--8<--]
>
>>> Someone thought they were done too early, only
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:17:55PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > On 8 September 2015 at 22:08, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
On 8 September 2015 at 22:28, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:17:55PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>> > On 8 September 2015 at 22:08, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> >>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:33:54PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On 8 September 2015 at 22:28, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:17:55PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> >> > On 8
On 09/09/2015 03:34 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
Hi,
Currently i have a raid1 configuration on two disks where one of them
is failing.
But since:
btrfs fi df /mnt/disk/
Data, RAID1: total=858.00GiB, used=638.16GiB
Data, single:
15 matches
Mail list logo