.
So the main question is if such asymmetric RAID0 configuration
possible at all and why does btrfs ignore ~500 GB of free space on
/dev/sdc drive?
Also it's interesting what will happen when I add 20 GB more data to
my FS. Should I be prepared to usual btrfs low-space problems?
Best
Brendan Hide posted on Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:42:17 +0200 as excerpted:
The raid0 will always distribute data to each disk relatively equally.
There are exceptions of course. The way to have it better utilise the
diskspace is to use either single (which won't get the same
performance as raid0)
Metadata, RAID1: total=10.00GiB, used=8.64GiB
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb 1.4T 424G 437G 50% /btr
I suppose I should trust to btrfs fi df, not df utility.
So the main question is if such asymmetric
