sorry for side question - but does this mean that btrfs-convert issues
others were having on kernel 4.0+ on this mailing list is now
addressed ?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/09/09 09:34 +0800:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Sorry
Vytautas D posted on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:35:50 +0100 as excerpted:
> sorry for side question - but does this mean that btrfs-convert issues
> others were having on kernel 4.0+ on this mailing list is now addressed
> ?
AFAIK they've not yet been entirely fixed, no. There's still active
(within
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:24:17AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> The problem is that, for converted image, it's quite possible that data
> and metadata extent are stored in one chunk even the chunk is not mixed.
>
> I'll add fsck support for it soon.
That would be great, I have no idea how the
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:34:53AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > David Sterba (79):
> >btrfs-progs: tests: log the test name in results file
> >btrfs-progs: tests: support more formats of test images
> >btrfs-progs: tests: use readlink -f to resolve path
> >
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Vytautas D wrote:
> sorry for side question - but does this mean that btrfs-convert issues
> others were having on kernel 4.0+ on this mailing list is now
> addressed ?
Per Qu's analysis yes, the broken versions are 3.19.1-4.0.1.
--
To unsubscribe from
On 2015-09-09 09:25, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:24:17AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
The problem is that, for converted image, it's quite possible that data
and metadata extent are stored in one chunk even the chunk is not mixed.
I'll add fsck support for it soon.
That would
David Sterba wrote on 2015/09/09 15:25 +0200:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:24:17AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
The problem is that, for converted image, it's quite possible that data
and metadata extent are stored in one chunk even the chunk is not mixed.
I'll add fsck support for it soon.
That
Hi David,
Sorry for the late reply, but I noticed something interesting.
David Sterba wrote on 2015/06/22 17:00 +0200:
Hi,
btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual load of
changes.
Fixed since rc1:
- uuid rewrite prints the correct original UUID
-
Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/09/09 09:34 +0800:
Hi David,
Sorry for the late reply, but I noticed something interesting.
David Sterba wrote on 2015/06/22 17:00 +0200:
Hi,
btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual
load of
changes.
Fixed since rc1:
- uuid rewrite
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:26:05PM +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
Thanks for the link...I updated it...The updated version breaks the
btrfsQuota.sh and btrfsQuota.py script from the wiki though :(
I see, but the scripts are likely to break anytime due to changes in the
qgroup output interfaces. You
On Tuesday 23 June 2015 16:45:01 David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
On Monday 22 June 2015 17:00:23 David Sterba wrote:
btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual
load
of changes.
Would it be beneficial to update
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
On Monday 22 June 2015 17:00:23 David Sterba wrote:
btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual load
of changes.
Would it be beneficial to update when using older kernels (3.19.x in my case)?
I can't upgrade
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:45:32PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Wow, nice collection of changes!
Thanks.
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2015, 17:00:23 schrieb David Sterba:
* new
- rescure zero-log
- btrfsune:
- rewrite uuid on a filesystem image
- new option to turn on NO_HOLES
On Monday 22 June 2015 17:00:23 David Sterba wrote:
Hi,
btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual load
of changes.
Would it be beneficial to update when using older kernels (3.19.x in my case)?
I can't upgrade to kernel 4.1 since my nvidia (propriety) drivers
Sjoerd wrote on 2015/06/23 11:03 +0200:
On Monday 22 June 2015 17:00:23 David Sterba wrote:
Hi,
btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual load
of changes.
Would it be beneficial to update when using older kernels (3.19.x in my case)?
Part(most) of.
Some one
On 2015-06-22 17:00, David Sterba wrote:
Hi,
Many thanks for your work.
BTW just for curiosity: is it a coincidence that both Torvalds and you released
the kernel 4.1/btrfs-progs 4.1 in the same day ? I know that the version are
coupled, but also the same day
BR
G.Baronelli
Hi,
btrfs-progs 4.1 have been released (in time with kernel 4.1). Unusual load of
changes.
Fixed since rc1:
- uuid rewrite prints the correct original UUID
- map-logical updated
- fi show size units
- typos
* bugfixes
- fsck.btrfs: no bash-isms
- bugzilla 97171: invalid memory
Wow, nice collection of changes!
Am Montag, 22. Juni 2015, 17:00:23 schrieb David Sterba:
* new
- rescure zero-log
- btrfsune:
- rewrite uuid on a filesystem image
- new option to turn on NO_HOLES incompat feature
Did you think about folding btrfstune into btrfs command as well?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:00:23PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
- qgroup:
- show: distinguish no limits and 0 limit value
- limit: ability to clear the limit
I'm using kernel 4.1-rc7 as per:
root@riff:/var/lib/lxc/juju-trusty-lxc-template/rootfs# uname -a
Linux riff
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:00:23PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
- qgroup:
- show: distinguish no limits and 0 limit value
- limit: ability to clear the limit
I'm using kernel 4.1-rc7 as per:
root@riff:/var/lib/lxc/juju-trusty-lxc-template/rootfs# uname -a
Linux riff
On 2015/06/23 3:18, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:00:23PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
- qgroup:
- show: distinguish no limits and 0 limit value
- limit: ability to clear the limit
I'm using kernel 4.1-rc7 as per:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 06:18:35PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Many thanks for your work.
BTW just for curiosity: is it a coincidence that both Torvalds and you
released the kernel 4.1/btrfs-progs 4.1 in the same day ? I know that
the version are coupled, but also the same day
This
Tsutomu Itoh wrote on 2015/06/23 08:55 +0900:
On 2015/06/23 3:18, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:00:23PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
- qgroup:
- show: distinguish no limits and 0 limit value
- limit: ability to clear the limit
I'm using kernel 4.1-rc7
Hi,
unusual load of changes. Among the small UI enhancements, the mkfs output
rework is worth mentioning separately. It's based on Goffredo's patches
but I've tweaked the output:
Current:
24 matches
Mail list logo