On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Austin S Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I've found out the hard way that system chunks really should be
RAID1, NOT RAID10, otherwise it's very likely that the filesystem
won't mount at all if you lose 2 disks.
Why would that be different?
In a RAID-1 you
On 2014-09-11 02:40, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Austin S Hemmelgarn ahferro...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I've found out the hard way that system chunks really should be
RAID1, NOT RAID10, otherwise it's very likely that the filesystem
won't mount at all if you lose 2 disks.
Why
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:19:00AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-09-11 02:40, Russell Coker wrote:
Also it would be nice if there was a N-way mirror option for system data.
As
such data is tiny (32MB on the 120G filesystem in my workstation) the space
used by having a copy
On 2014-09-11 07:38, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:19:00AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-09-11 02:40, Russell Coker wrote:
Also it would be nice if there was a N-way mirror option for system data.
As
such data is tiny (32MB on the 120G filesystem in my
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:06:21AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-09-11 07:38, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:19:00AM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-09-11 02:40, Russell Coker wrote:
Also it would be nice if there was a N-way mirror option for system
On 2014-09-07 16:38, Or Tal wrote:
Hi,
I've created a new raid10 array from 4, 4TB drives in order to migrate
old data to it.
As I didn't have enough sata ports, I:
- disconnected one of the raid10 disks to free a sata port,
- connected an old disk I wanted to migrate,
- mounted the array
Hi,
I've created a new raid10 array from 4, 4TB drives in order to migrate
old data to it.
As I didn't have enough sata ports, I:
- disconnected one of the raid10 disks to free a sata port,
- connected an old disk I wanted to migrate,
- mounted the array with -o degraded
- copied the data it it.
