On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 05:43:24PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
So in my case when I hit that case, I had to use dusage=0 to recover.
Anything above that just didn't work.
I suspect when using more than zero the first chunk it wanted to balance
wasn't empty - and it had nowhere to put it.
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 04:09:27PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 05:43:24PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
So in my case when I hit that case, I had to use dusage=0 to recover.
Anything above that just didn't work.
I suspect when using more than zero the first chunk it
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
N=n
F=0
while (N 0) {
balance -dusage=F,limit=N
N -= number of balanced chunks
F++
}
The patch is in branch dev/balance-limit in my git repos.
We can then implement the n-least-full as a synthetic
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:07:29PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
In the case above, because the filesystem is only 55% full, I can
ask balance to rewrite all chunks that are more than 55% full:
legolas:~# btrfs balance start -dusage=50 /mnt/btrfs_pool1
-dusage=50 will balance all chunks that
Hi, Marc. Inline below. :)
On 2014/05/06 02:19 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:07:29PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
In the case above, because the filesystem is only 55% full, I can
ask balance to rewrite all chunks that are more than 55% full:
legolas:~# btrfs balance start
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:30:31PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
Hi, Marc. Inline below. :)
On 2014/05/06 02:19 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:07:29PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
In the case above, because the filesystem is only 55% full, I can
ask balance to rewrite all
Brendan Hide posted on Tue, 06 May 2014 18:30:31 +0200 as excerpted:
So in my case when I hit that case, I had to use dusage=0 to recover.
Anything above that just didn't work.
I suspect when using more than zero the first chunk it wanted to balance
wasn't empty - and it had nowhere to put
I've just written this new page:
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/btrfs/post_2014-05-04_Fixing-Btrfs-Filesystem-Full-Problems.html
First, are there problems in it?
Second, are there other FS full issues I should mention in it?
Thanks,
Marc
--
A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you
On 05/05/14 14:16, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I've just written this new page:
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/btrfs/post_2014-05-04_Fixing-Btrfs-Filesystem-Full-Problems.html
First, are there problems in it?
Second, are there other FS full issues I should mention in it?
Thanks,
Marc
In the case above,
On 05/05/14 19:07, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 05/05/14 14:16, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I've just written this new page:
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/btrfs/post_2014-05-04_Fixing-Btrfs-Filesystem-Full-Problems.html
First, are there problems in it?
Second, are there other FS full issues I should
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 19:07 +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 05/05/14 14:16, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I've just written this new page:
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/btrfs/post_2014-05-04_Fixing-Btrfs-Filesystem-Full-Problems.html
First, are there problems in it?
Second, are there other FS full
On Mon, 5 May 2014 14:36:09 Calvin Walton wrote:
The standard response on the mailing list for this issue is to
temporarily add an additional device to the filesystem (even e.g. a 4GB
USB flash drive is often enough) - this will add space to allocate a few
new chunks, allowing the balance to
12 matches
Mail list logo
