USB memory sticks wear & speed: btrfs vs f2fs?

2016-02-09 Thread Martin
How does btrfs compare to f2fs for use on (128GByte) USB memory sticks? Particularly for wearing out certain storage blocks? Does btrfs heavily use particular storage blocks that will prematurely "wear out"? (That is, could the whole 128GBytes be lost due to one 4kByte block having been

Re: USB memory sticks wear & speed: btrfs vs f2fs?

2016-02-09 Thread Brendan Hide
On 2/9/2016 1:13 PM, Martin wrote: How does btrfs compare to f2fs for use on (128GByte) USB memory sticks? Particularly for wearing out certain storage blocks? Does btrfs heavily use particular storage blocks that will prematurely "wear out"? (That is, could the whole 128GBytes be lost due to

Re: USB memory sticks wear & speed: btrfs vs f2fs?

2016-02-09 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2016-02-09 09:08, Brendan Hide wrote: On 2/9/2016 1:13 PM, Martin wrote: How does btrfs compare to f2fs for use on (128GByte) USB memory sticks? Particularly for wearing out certain storage blocks? Does btrfs heavily use particular storage blocks that will prematurely "wear out"? (That

Re: USB memory sticks wear & speed: btrfs vs f2fs?

2016-02-09 Thread Kai Krakow
Am Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:59:12 -0500 schrieb "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" : > > I haven't found much reference or comparison information online wrt > > wear leveling - mostly performance benchmarks that don't really > > address your request. Personally I will likely never bother with