On 2016-02-08 16:44, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
On Feb 07 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
Hello,
I have a large home directory on a
On Feb 09 2016, Kai Krakow wrote:
> You could even format a bcache superblock "just in case",
> and add an SSD later. Without SSD, bcache will just work in passthru
> mode.
Do the LVM concerns still apply in passthrough mode, or only when
there's an actual cache?
Thanks,
On Feb 09 2016, Kai Krakow wrote:
> I'm myself using bcache+btrfs and it ran bullet proof so far, even
> after unintentional resets or power outage. It's important tho to NOT
> put any storage layer between bcache and your devices or between btrfs
> and your device as there
On Feb 09 2016, Kai Krakow wrote:
>> If there's no way to put LVM anywhere into the stack that'd be a
>> bummer, I very much want to use dm-crypt (and I guess that counts as
>> lvm?).
>
> Wasn't there plans for integrating per-file encryption into btrfs (like
> there's
Am Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:10:15 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
> On Feb 09 2016, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > You could even format a bcache superblock "just in case",
> > and add an SSD later. Without SSD, bcache will just work in passthru
> > mode.
>
> Do the LVM
Am Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:09:20 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
> On Feb 09 2016, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > I'm myself using bcache+btrfs and it ran bullet proof so far, even
> > after unintentional resets or power outage. It's important tho to
> > NOT put any
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Wasn't there plans for integrating per-file encryption into btrfs (like
> there's already for ext4)? I think this could pretty well obsolete your
> plans - except you prefer full-device encryption.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:44:17 -0800
> schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
>
>> On Feb 07 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> > Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
>> >>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Feb 09 2016, Kai Krakow wrote:
>>> If there's no way to put LVM anywhere into the stack that'd be a
>>> bummer, I very much want to use dm-crypt (and I guess that counts as
>>> lvm?).
>>
>> Wasn't
On Feb 08 2016, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Otherwise I'll give bcache a shot. I've avoided it so far because of the
> need to reformat and because of rumours that it doesn't work well with
> LVM or BTRFS. But it sounds as if that's not the case..
I now have the following stack:
On 2016-02-07 15:59, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
Hello,
I have a large home directory on a spinning disk that I regularly
synchronize between different
Am Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:44:17 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
> On Feb 07 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
> >> Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
> >>
> >> schrieb Nikolaus Rath
On 02/08/2016 09:29 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-02-08 08:20, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 02/08/2016 08:24 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-02-07 15:59, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
On 2016-02-08 08:20, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 02/08/2016 08:24 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-02-07 15:59, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
Hello,
I have
On 02/08/2016 08:24 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2016-02-07 15:59, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
Hello,
I have a large home directory on a spinning
Nikolaus Rath posted on Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:44:17 -0800 as excerpted:
> Otherwise I'll give bcache a shot. I've avoided it so far because of the
> need to reformat and because of rumours that it doesn't work well with
> LVM or BTRFS. But it sounds as if that's not the case..
Bcache used to have
On Feb 07 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
>> Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
>>
>> schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I have a large home directory on a spinning disk that I
Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
> Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
>
> schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a large home directory on a spinning disk that I regularly
> > synchronize between different computers using unison. That
Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
> Hello,
>
> I have a large home directory on a spinning disk that I regularly
> synchronize between different computers using unison. That takes ages,
> even though the amount of changed files is typically small. I
Hello,
I have a large home directory on a spinning disk that I regularly
synchronize between different computers using unison. That takes ages,
even though the amount of changed files is typically small. I suspect
most if the time is spend walking through the file system and checking
mtimes.
So
Martin Steigerwald posted on Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:59:48 +0100 as excerpted:
> Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2016, 21:07:13 CET schrieb Kai Krakow:
>> Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:06:58 -0800
>>
>> schrieb Nikolaus Rath :
>>>
>>> I have a large home directory on a spinning disk that I
21 matches
Mail list logo