Re: deleted subvols don't go away?

2017-08-28 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:03:47 +0300 Nikolay Borisov wrote: > when the cleaner thread runs again the snapshot's root item is going to > be deleted for good and you no longer will see it. Oh, that's pretty sweet -- it means there's actually a way to reliably wait for

Re: deleted subvols don't go away?

2017-08-28 Thread Hugo Mills
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:03:47PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 28.08.2017 11:07, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > Thanks... > > > > Still a bit strange that it displays that entry... especially with a > > generation that seems newer than what I thought was the actually last > >

Re: deleted subvols don't go away?

2017-08-28 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 28.08.2017 11:07, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Thanks... > > Still a bit strange that it displays that entry... especially with a > generation that seems newer than what I thought was the actually last > generation on the fs. Snapshot destroy is a 2-phase process. The first phase

Re: deleted subvols don't go away?

2017-08-28 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Thanks... Still a bit strange that it displays that entry... especially with a generation that seems newer than what I thought was the actually last generation on the fs. Cheers, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: deleted subvols don't go away?

2017-08-28 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 28.08.2017 06:43, Janos Toth F. wrote: > ID=5 is the default, "root" or "toplevel" subvolume which can't be > deleted anyway (at least normally, I am not sure if some debug-magic > can achieve that). > I just checked this (out of curiosity) and all my Btrfs filesystems > report something very

Re: deleted subvols don't go away?

2017-08-27 Thread Janos Toth F.
ID=5 is the default, "root" or "toplevel" subvolume which can't be deleted anyway (at least normally, I am not sure if some debug-magic can achieve that). I just checked this (out of curiosity) and all my Btrfs filesystems report something very similar to yours (I thought DELETED was a made up

deleted subvols don't go away?

2017-08-27 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey. Just wondered... On a number of filesystems I've removed several subvoumes (with -c)... even called btrfs filesystem sync afterwards... and waited quite a while (with the fs mounted rw) until no disk activity seems to happen anymore. Yet all these fs shows some deleted subvols e.g.: btrfs