Jon Nelson posted on Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:21:02 -0500 as excerpted:
# btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=1.80TiB, used=832.22GiB
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=204.00KiB
Metadata, DUP: total=5.50GiB, used=5.00GiB
[The 0-used single listings left over from filesystem creation omitted.]
Jon Nelson posted on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:00:51 -0500 as excerpted:
Using openSUSE 13.1 on x86_64 which - as of this writing - is 3.11.10,
Would a more recent kernel than 3.11 have done me any good?
[Reordered the kernel question from below to here, where you reported the
running version.]
As
This is just a rave-post to praise Duncan for his excellent post back to
Jon!
This will surely help a good number of new btrfs users who have the good
sense to watch this mailing list. Your exposition on the balance command
helped to clarify in my mind exactly why someone might want to use
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
Jon Nelson posted on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:00:51 -0500 as excerpted:
Using openSUSE 13.1 on x86_64 which - as of this writing - is 3.11.10,
Would a more recent kernel than 3.11 have done me any good?
[Reordered the kernel question from below to here,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 06:21:02PM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
Duncan 1i5t5.duncan at cox.net writes:
Jon Nelson posted on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:00:51 -0500 as excerpted:
[snip]
Below are the btrfs fi df / and btrfs fi show.
turnip:~ # btrfs fi df /
Data, single: total=1.80TiB,
Using openSUSE 13.1 on x86_64 which - as of this writing - is 3.11.10,
I tried to copy a bunch of files over to a btrfs filesystem (which was
mounted as /, in fact).
After some time, things ground to a halt and I got out of disk space errors.
btrfs fi df / showed about 1TB of *data* free, and
