On 2014/03/27 04:51 AM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
[snip]
We add t/p/e support by replacing lib/cmdline.c:memparse
with btrfs_memparse. The btrfs_memparse copies memparse's code
and add unit t/p/e parsing.
Is there a conflict preventing adding this to memparse directly?
--
__
Brendan Hide
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:35:41AM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2014/03/27 04:51 AM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
[snip]
We add t/p/e support by replacing lib/cmdline.c:memparse
with btrfs_memparse. The btrfs_memparse copies memparse's code
and add unit t/p/e parsing.
Is there a conflict preventing
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:27 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:35:41AM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2014/03/27 04:51 AM, Gui Hecheng wrote:
[snip]
We add t/p/e support by replacing lib/cmdline.c:memparse
with btrfs_memparse. The btrfs_memparse copies memparse's code