Hi Jeff,
Since I don't have RedHat support, I opened a bug through bugzilla.redhat.com.
The bug number is 800082. I see that it was assigned to you.
Thank you for future correspondence while troubleshooting this bug. I can
coordinate with the end user experiencing this bug, if you think it
> Message du 05/03/12 10:48
> De : "sergio.conrad"
> A : "Jeff Layton"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: cifs oplock windows share
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry for the lack of clarity of my precendents posts:
> subject: mount share problems with fedora core 14, winbind,pam_mount,cifs
> windows 200
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, santosh nayak
wrote:
> From: Santosh Nayak
>
> Memory is allocated irrespective of whether CIFS_ACL is configured
> or not. But free is happenning only if CIFS_ACL is set. This is a
> possible memory leak scenario.
>
> Fix is:
> Allocate and free memory only if CI
Hi,
I've got a clue howto do this, but it can be wromng, since I know
howto program sockets since some months now.
It's doable with a eventfd.
Notifyfs can create when dealing with cifs an event fd, and pass it
via a socket to mount.cifs.
Mount.cifs passes this to the kernel via an option, and w
Can you please comment on it ?
regards
santosh
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, santosh nayak
wrote:
> From: Santosh Nayak
>
> Memory is allocated irrespective of whether CIFS_ACL is configured
> or not. But free is happenning only if CIFS_ACL is set. This is a
> possible memory leak scenario.
Hi,
I'm working on a successor of gamin, a file system change notifier.
Like with gamin client apps can connect to it and instruct it to watch
a specific path.
It's up to the notifyfs service to decide what backend (inotify,
polling etc) to use.
New in my fs is the ability to "forward" the requ
