Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:04:05 PM Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:40:03AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > > Furthermore, that applies only to devices that use synchronous suspend. > > > Async suspend is becoming common, and the

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2015-10-25 06:54:39) >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 04:17:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > >> >> Well, I&#

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 04:17:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> Well, I'm not quite sure why exactly everyone is so focused on probing here. > > Probe deferral is really noisy even if it's working fine

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, October 23, 2015 11:34:34 AM Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Tim Bird wrote: > > On 10/22/2015 11:53 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: > >> On 10/22/2015 7:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:05:11AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >>

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 06:21:55 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 20 October 2015 at 18:04, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:40:03AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > >> > >> > Furthermore, that applies only to devices that use synchronous s

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:55:14 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 09:15:01 AM Rob Herring wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki >

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 08:35:28 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > --7fVr/IRGAG9sAW4J > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:14:46PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Tomeu

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 09:15:01 AM Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, October 19, 2015 05:58:40 PM Rob Herring wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki > >> wrote: > >> &g

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 19, 2015 05:58:40 PM Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, October 19, 2015 10:58:25 AM Rob Herring wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:29 AM, David Woodhouse > >> wrote: > >> >

Re: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing

2015-10-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 19, 2015 10:58:25 AM Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:29 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 15:50 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > But the point I'm making is that we are working towards *fixing* that, > >> > and *not* using DT-specific code in pl

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PM / Domains: Make pm_genpd_{add,remove}_subdomain() available to modules

2015-10-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:22:53 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: > Export these symbols so they can be used in loadable kernel > modules. > > Cc: Rob Clark > Cc: Rajendra Nayak > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Ulf Hansson > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boy

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] cpufreq: qoriq: Don't look at clock implementation details

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, September 25, 2015 04:17:07 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 23:42 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:46:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 19-09-15, 23:29, Scott Wood wrote: > > > > Get the CPU clock'

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] cpufreq: qoriq: Don't look at clock implementation details

2015-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:46:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19-09-15, 23:29, Scott Wood wrote: > > Get the CPU clock's potential parent clocks from the clock interface > > itself, rather than manually parsing the clocks property to find a > > phandle, looking at the clock-names property of

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support

2015-09-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 08, 2015 06:41:00 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series adds suspend frequency support (using opp-v2 > bindings and suspend-opp functionality) to cpufreq-dt driver and > then adds suspend opp for Exynos4412 based boards. > > This patch series fixes