[Linux-cluster] Speeding up GFS on 1 node cluster

2008-02-01 Thread Shawn Hood
I currently have several machines I'm about to cluster using RHCS, utilizing shared storage (XRAID w/ GFS). I currently have another existing XRAID which is mounted on one machine. I need to move all this data from this existing XRAID to the new GFS XRAID. Right now, I have a one-node cluster ru

[Linux-cluster] Cluster nodenames, question

2008-02-01 Thread m.. mm..
Hi everyone! How about this RedHat ClusterSuite 5.1 configuration, if i have example 2 nodes test1 and test2: Network is configured like this: prodution network test1 ip=10.10.10.5 test2 ip=10.10.10.6 Private Heartbeat network test1hb ip=192.168.0.2 (machine= test1) test2hb ip=192.168.0.3

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread Brian Kroth
Gordan Bobic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For more meaningful results, try iozone. > > Gordan > yeah iozone -a is pretty easy. For anyone who's interested: some graphs from results I got a couple weeks ago while running it on 5 nodes at once: https://mywebspace.wisc.edu/bpkroth/web/fs-cluster/fs-clust

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread Gordan Bobic
For more meaningful results, try iozone. Gordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, wonderful day knee deep in fibre channel. Does anyone know how I can test NFS speeds in a similar fashion to hdparm -tT? All the testing I've ever done was with hdparm so that's my reference point. Mike On Thu, 31

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread Johannes Russek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I looked at it before but it looked like I'd have to spend some time learning it as I was not able to find some example commands for basic drive speed stats. Mike I can't test it right now, but i think it should just be bonnie -s 2000 the number being any size of

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I looked at it before but it looked like I'd have to spend some time learning it as I was not able to find some example commands for basic drive speed stats. Mike On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:52:10 +0100, Johannes Russek wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > >> Ah, wonderful day knee deep in fibre

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread Johannes Russek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Ah, wonderful day knee deep in fibre channel. Does anyone know how I can test NFS speeds in a similar fashion to hdparm -tT? All the testing I've ever done was with hdparm so that's my reference point. Mike Hi Mike, hdparm -tT is nice and easy but i'm afraid it

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, wonderful day knee deep in fibre channel. Does anyone know how I can test NFS speeds in a similar fashion to hdparm -tT? All the testing I've ever done was with hdparm so that's my reference point. Mike On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:39:56 -0600, Brian Kroth wrote: > Johannes Russek <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't need the LVM log. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wanted the syslog > extracts for the DLM startup. I also wanted to see the netstat AFTER > starting the dlm on the first node (and if there were any errors), then > the same things (on both nodes) when the second node was added. Ok, I'll resol

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update for anyone watching :). I've eliminated GFS as being the slowdown at least. No ideas on the DLM problems but I'll get back to that after I figure out the slowdown. Seems that the storage controller has problems so I'll either change out the chassis or controllers if I can. Once I nuke th

Re: [Linux-cluster] postgres cluster with RHEL5

2008-02-01 Thread Terry
On Feb 1, 2008 10:30 AM, Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 10:09 AM, Lon Hohberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 23:10 -0600, Terry wrote: > > > > > > > name="database" recovery="relocate"> > > > > > >

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm still getting very long delays before access. Is there some way of testing this to see if it's the storage or the GFS setup? Like a test I could run with the storage connected raw then with GFS? Perhaps I just kill the partition, run some test, format it as GFS again, mount it, test? Mike

Re: [Linux-cluster] postgres cluster with RHEL5

2008-02-01 Thread Terry
On Feb 1, 2008 10:09 AM, Lon Hohberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 23:10 -0600, Terry wrote: > > > > name="database" recovery="relocate"> > > > > > > > >

Re: [Linux-cluster] Storage problem in Linux Cluster

2008-02-01 Thread Lon Hohberger
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 14:57 +0530, Abhra Paul wrote: > Respected Users > > I have a problem in cluster. One user of this cluster needs huge > amount of space. In this cluster one big partition(size 1TB) is > mounted on /data . So I provide this amount of space for his program > execution. At 1

Re: [Linux-cluster] postgres cluster with RHEL5

2008-02-01 Thread Lon Hohberger
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 23:10 -0600, Terry wrote: > name="database" recovery="relocate"> > > > > > That's not going to work; the dependencies are backward

Re: [Linux-cluster] How to set node timeout when using gulm?

2008-02-01 Thread Lon Hohberger
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:20 -0800, Vectorz Sigma wrote: > I'm aware of how to do this for CMAN but I'm running gulm. I can't > find information anywhere on how to do this. > > Anyone know? According to the gulm.5 man page: heartbeat_rate The rate at which the heartbeats are

Re: [Linux-cluster] RHEL5 CLVMD hang

2008-02-01 Thread Nuno Fernandes
Hi, CLVM is hung again. This time, the problem started when we restarted clvmd in one node (xen1). Xen2 started to report: Feb 1 15:26:34 xen2 kernel: dlm: recover_master_copy -53 103e7 Feb 1 15:26:34 xen2 kernel: dlm: recover_master_copy -53 10264 Feb 1 15:26:34 xen2 kernel: dlm: recover_ma

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread Brian Kroth
jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Donnerstag, den 31.01.2008, 19:29 -0600 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > I've not looked into this yet so don't know what to edit or add. > > > > On one node, the drive is /dev/sda, but on some nodes, it'll be sdx because > > some of the machines already have SCSI d

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread jr
Am Donnerstag, den 31.01.2008, 19:29 -0600 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I've not looked into this yet so don't know what to edit or add. > > On one node, the drive is /dev/sda, but on some nodes, it'll be sdx because > some of the machines already have SCSI drives in them. Not hard to see, just

Re: [Linux-cluster] DLM Problem

2008-02-01 Thread Patrick Caulfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Can you boot a single node, without any cluster software running, then >> do the 'netstat -tap'. Then start the cluster software and do it again. > > compdev# netstat -tap > Active Internet connections (servers and established) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreig

[Linux-cluster] Storage problem in Linux Cluster

2008-02-01 Thread Abhra Paul
Respected Users I have a problem in cluster. One user of this cluster needs huge amount of space. In this cluster one big partition(size 1TB) is mounted on /data . So I provide this amount of space for his program execution. At 1.30 PM he occupied 200GB of this storage(which is mounted on /dat

[Linux-cluster] look gfs2 resource have some problem

2008-02-01 Thread chenzp
hi all: I have some problem about gfs2 mds and cluster component. The problem as follows: Frist problem:I want known the cluster Component how to manager GFS2 MDS. Secondly problem: The other proble how to sync mds. thanks! carry.chen -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.c

Re: [Linux-cluster] postgres cluster with RHEL5

2008-02-01 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Cosimo Streppone wrote: I also wouldn't recommend NFS, but I never tried that myself with pg. Only had bad experiences with NFS shares hanging up processes for long. See PostgreSQL archives -- NFS is considered *very* harmful for many apps, and also to PostgreSQL.

Re: [Linux-cluster] postgres cluster with RHEL5

2008-02-01 Thread Cosimo Streppone
Terry wrote: I am trying to get an active-passive postgres cluster going. I have a shared storage with NFS. I just can't get it going. I am using luci to configure this which, from what I have been reading, is somewhat buggy in the postgres-8 arena. My first question is what components of po