Hi List,
2 Servers - connected with crossover
my rpms:
gfs2-utils-0.1.38-1.el5
gfs-utils-0.1.12-1.el5
kmod-gfs2-1.52-1.16.el5
cman-2.0.73-1.el5_1.1
my cluster.conf on both sites
-
Read the top section of the script itself. I explain that the install
script of viperltoolkit does not install the AppUtil directory with the
rest of itself in your particular site_perl dir.
do a
$ locate site_perl
to see where on your system has your site_perl director(y|ies), and look
in each o
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:25 +0100, Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our five node cluster running the same software version on all
> machines, two of them have started to emit assertion failure messages:
>
> Feb 26 13:54:47 web0 kernel: GFS: fsid=kfki:services.4: warning: assertion
> "gfs_gl
Any ideas why dlm_sendd is taking up 100% CPU ?
We have this intermittent problem which seems to happen when a group
of users log into our servers at the same time, possibly opening/
writing files from the same mount point.
Should dlm_sendd ever take up 100% of the CPU ?
Any help would be g
Roger Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-26 09:44:
>
> --- Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > First of all thanks for the fast reply.
> >
> > Is LVS possible without additional HW, so it can
> > balance between the
> > local service and the service on another node?
> >
>
> using the LVS te
--- Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all thanks for the fast reply.
>
> Is LVS possible without additional HW, so it can
> balance between the
> local service and the service on another node?
>
using the LVS terminologie.
the LVS can be on the same server where real service
is run
First of all thanks for the fast reply.
Is LVS possible without additional HW, so it can balance between the
local service and the service on another node?
Thanks
Am 26.02.2008 um 15:13 schrieb jr:
you only need to install a Load balance frontend to
the ldap servers :-) so the connection
Hi Peter,
Has anybody experiences in clustering LDAP Server? I am thinking about having
a GFS location where one LDAP Database is located and two LDAP Server nodes
are accessing.
I'd recommend you look at replication rather than trying to do this through
Red Hat Cluster Suite.
Is it possib
Hi,
In our five node cluster running the same software version on all
machines, two of them have started to emit assertion failure messages:
Feb 26 13:54:47 web0 kernel: GFS: fsid=kfki:services.4: warning: assertion
"gfs_glock_is_locked_by_me(ip->i_gl)" failed
Feb 26 13:54:47 web0 kernel: GFS: f
> you only need to install a Load balance frontend to
> the ldap servers :-) so the connections can be
> distributed to all ldap servers and any downtime of
> any server can be hidden from the clients
> transparently
> LVS from RHCS can help you with that in the case you
> do not have the specifi
Hi
What is the politic of service status request :
it seems that there is systematically a status request
just after the start of the service and then a periodic
status (depending on monitor variable in script.sh) but the
1st periodic status can be requested between 1 and xx secunds
just after the
--- Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Has anybody experiences in clustering LDAP Server? I
> am thinking about
> having a GFS location where one LDAP Database is
> located and two LDAP
> Server nodes are accessing.
> Is it possible to have both of them up and running
> (active/activ
Hi!
Has anybody experiences in clustering LDAP Server? I am thinking about
having a GFS location where one LDAP Database is located and two LDAP
Server nodes are accessing.
Is it possible to have both of them up and running (active/activ) or
is this configuration not recommended?
Maybe it
>> 3) after clu2 is started again, VM is automatically migrated to clu1
>> according to logs and this fails.
>
> According to the logs the vm:win2003 was migrated to clu2 and not to clu1
> as you wrote.
Sure, this is my typo...
>> Do anybody know, why this fails?
>
> What exactly do you want to
Quoting Jakub Suchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I am currently testing following cluster of VM machines:
Two nodes, Shared storage, APC fencing device.
cluster.conf follows.
I am encountering this situation:
1) VM is running on clu2
2) clu2 gets fenced and VM is migrated to clu1
3) after clu2 is s
Hi,
I am currently testing following cluster of VM machines:
Two nodes, Shared storage, APC fencing device.
cluster.conf follows.
I am encountering this situation:
1) VM is running on clu2
2) clu2 gets fenced and VM is migrated to clu1
3) after clu2 is started again, VM is automatically migrated t
16 matches
Mail list logo
