On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Wendy Cheng wrote:
Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
There are three different netconsole log recordings at
http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/gfs/
One of the new console logs has a good catch (netconsole0.txt): you *do*
have
a
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Wendy Cheng wrote:
Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
There are three different netconsole log recordings at
http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/gfs/
One of the new console logs has a good catch (netconsole0.txt): you *do* have
a deadlock as the CPUs are spinning waiting for spin
Hi all,
Sombredy knows when cman will be patched to works ok when it is used with two
nodes and quorum partitions??
Thanks ...
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
Problem
Cluster Status Quorum Disk is Offline
[r...@cgate1 /]# service qdiskd status
qdiskd (pid 25892) is running...
[r...@cgate2 ~]# service qdiskd status
qdiskd (pid 29673) is running...
# clustat
Cluster Status for CG1 @ Mon Mar 30 13:14:17 2009
Member Status: Quorate
Member Name
I've a few machines sharing a couple GFS/LVM volumes that are physically on an
AOE device. Each machine has two network interfaces; LAN and the AOE SAN. I
don't have IP addresses on the SAN interfaces so the cluster is communicating
via the LAN.
Is this ideal or should I configure them to
2009/3/30 redhat redhat redhat-l...@mail.ru:
Problem
Cluster Status Quorum Disk is Offline
[r...@cgate1 /]# service qdiskd status
qdiskd (pid 25892) is running...
[r...@cgate2 ~]# service qdiskd status
qdiskd (pid 29673) is running...
# clustat
Cluster Status for CG1 @ Mon Mar 30
Mar 30 17:09:44 cgate1 openais[2985]: [CMAN ] quorum device unregistered
Mar 30 17:09:48 cgate1 qdiskd[6476]: info Quorum Daemon Initializing
-Original Message-
From: redhat redhat redhat-l...@mail.ru
To: Shang Wu sh...@ubuntu.com
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:12:08 +0400
Subject: Re[2]:
Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
You mean the part of the patch
@@ -1503,6 +1503,15 @@ gfs_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
struct
error = gfs_glock_nq_init(ip-i_gl, LM_ST_SHARED, LM_FLAG_ANY, gh);
if (!error) {
generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
+
-Original Message-
From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Paul Dugas
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:06 AM
To: Linux-Cluster Mailing List
Subject: [Linux-cluster] Cluster Networks
I've a few machines sharing a couple GFS/LVM
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:47:00PM +0100, Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
Hi,
Freshly built cluster-2.03.11 reproducibly freezes as mailman started.
The versions are:
linux-2.6.27.21
cluster-2.03.11
openais from svn, subrev 1152 version 0.80
So, in summary:
- nodes 1-5 are correctly forming a
-Original Message-
From: Paul Dugas [mailto:p...@dugas.cc]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 1:56 PM
To: Jeff Sturm
Cc: linux clustering
Subject: RE: [Linux-cluster] Cluster Networks
...
It would be simple to setup an IP subnet for the SAN and
adjust the cluster configs to use
Wendy Cheng wrote:
Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
You mean the part of the patch
@@ -1503,6 +1503,15 @@ gfs_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry
*dentry, struct
error = gfs_glock_nq_init(ip-i_gl, LM_ST_SHARED, LM_FLAG_ANY, gh);
if (!error) {
Hi,
I setup two cluster in same subnet, using the same name, it seems the
later cluster can not startup. I try to start cman but failed. My
environment is RHEL 5.3.
My question: Is it possible to use the same cluster name in same subnet?
Best Regards.
Chen Ming
--
Linux-cluster mailing
13 matches
Mail list logo
