Hi Rafael,
Good testing, it confirms that some additional barriers are necessary to
prevent undesired behaviours.
I'll test by tomorrow the same procedure at VG level.
2009/7/30 Rafael Micó Miranda
> Hi Brem
>
> El jue, 30-07-2009 a las 09:15 +0200, brem belguebli escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > do
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:04 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:15:46 +0200 Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> > The update packages should be available today or tomorrow depending on
> > your local mirror.
> >
> > Fabio
>
> Hi,
> Is this version with the fix the one that I would pick u
Hi Brem
El jue, 30-07-2009 a las 09:15 +0200, brem belguebli escribió:
> Hi,
>
> does it look like we're hiting some "undesired feature" ;-)
>
> Concerning the 0 nodeid, I think I read that on some Redhat documents
> or bugzilla report, I could find it out.
>
> Brem
>
>
>
>
> -
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:15:46 +0200 Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> The update packages should be available today or tomorrow depending on
> your local mirror.
>
> Fabio
Hi,
Is this version with the fix the one that I would pick up enabling
updates-testing repo?
[r...@tekkafedora ~]# yum --enablerepo up
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:53 +0200, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 17:12 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > by mistake I previously sent this to fedora-list.
> > I resend to the appropriate list I wanted...
> > Excuse in advance for eventual cross-posting effects for anyo
Hi,
does it look like we're hiting some "undesired feature" ;-)
Concerning the 0 nodeid, I think I read that on some Redhat documents or
bugzilla report, I could find it out.
Brem
2009/7/30, Christine Caulfield :
>
> On 30/07/09 06:42, Xinwei Hu wrote:
>
>> Hi Christine,
>>
>> I can always a
