Hi Rafael,
Of course, that is what I was telling you the other day, your script works
fine, but I just wanted to twist a little clvm.
The prerequisites are already setup (locking type, dm-mp, lvm, etc...).
The only thing that disturbes me is that you can bypass under certain
conditions the locking.
Hi Brem,
El vie, 31-07-2009 a las 06:09 -0400, cr...@redhat.com escribió:
>
> --- mensagem original ---
> De: brem belguebli
> Assunto: Re: [Linux-cluster] CLVMD without GFS
> Data: 29 de Julho de 2009
> Hora: 10:1:29
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Just posted the basic tests I'm doing on both linux-clust
Hi,
Same behaviour as the one from Rafael.
Everything is coherent as long as you use the exclusive flag from the rogue
node, the locking does the job. Deactivating an already opened VG (mounted
lvol) is not possible either. How could this behave in case one used raw
devices instead of FS ?
But w
--- mensagem original ---
De: brem belguebli
Assunto: Re: [Linux-cluster] CLVMD without GFS
Data: 29 de Julho de 2009
Hora: 10:1:29
Hi Rafael,
Just posted the basic tests I'm doing on both linux-cluster and linux-lvm.
I can't get exclusive activation to work properly, I may be missing some
st
A
--- mensagem original ---
De: brem belguebli
Assunto: Re: [Linux-cluster] CLVMD without GFS
Data: 29 de Julho de 2009
Hora: 10:1:29
Hi Rafael,
Just posted the basic tests I'm doing on both linux-cluster and linux-lvm.
I can't get exclusive activation to work properly, I may be missing some
s
