Hi Dave,
Thanks for your rely!
I changed the cluster.conf as you suggested on both nodes. and
re-formatted the block device by
'mkfs.gfs2 -t testgfs2:1 -j 2 /dev/sdb'.
the following are the info needed.
I) user space utils version:
[r...@cool ~]# rpm -qi cman
Name: cman
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Christine
Caulfield wrote:
> On 13/08/09 16:30, Paras pradhan wrote:
>>
>> I have a three nodes cluster with Total Cluster Votes: 3 and Minimum
>> Required Quorum: 2
>>
>> Can I change Minimum Required Quorum to 1?
>>
>
> You can change it what whatever you like,
On 13/08/09 16:30, Paras pradhan wrote:
I have a three nodes cluster with Total Cluster Votes: 3 and Minimum
Required Quorum: 2
Can I change Minimum Required Quorum to 1?
You can change it what whatever you like, but if you change it to
something too low (ie anything less that cman decides
I have a three nodes cluster with Total Cluster Votes: 3 and Minimum
Required Quorum: 2
Can I change Minimum Required Quorum to 1?
Thanks
Paras.
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
Hi Lon and Thanks for this reply.
In fact, thinking about it, my test wasn't very much representative of what
I was expecting to do.
I blocked the qdisk communications to only one node which, after reading
your reply, kind of confirmed me that I did the wong test. I'm going to re
run it by blocki
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM, NTOUGHE GUY-SERGE wrote:
>
> Hi gurus,
>
> i installed RHEL 5.3 on 2 servers which participating to a cluster
> composed of these 2 nodes:
> kernel version:
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.el5
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-128.el5
> cman-devel-2.0.98-1
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 00:45 +0200, brem belguebli wrote:
> My understanding of qdisk is that it is used as a tie-breaker, but it
> looks like it is more a heatbeat vector than a simple tie-breaker.
Right, it's a secondary membership algorithm.
> Until here, no real problem indeed, if the site g
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:22:11PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>
That's not a valid combination, two_node="1" requires expected_votes="1".
You didn't mention which userspace cluster version/release you're using, or
include any status about the cluster. Before trying to mount gfs on either
node,
Hi gurus,
i installed RHEL 5.3 on 2 servers which participating to a cluster composed of
these 2 nodes:
kernel version:
kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.el5
kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.el5
cman-devel-2.0.98-1.el5_3.1
cman-2.0.98-1.el5_3.1
cluster-cim-0.12.1-2.el5
lvm2-cluster-2.02.4
Hi.
How to create a cluster of 2 nodes in rhel5.4 (or Fedora 10) with KVM?
With XEN follow this guide:
http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/wiki/VMClusterCookbook?highlight =
(CategoryHowTo).
Do you have a guide to implementation of RHCS in KVM?
Thank you all.
NJ
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Lin
2009/8/13 Hakan VELIOGLU
> Thanks for all the answers.
>
> I think there is realy no backup heartbeat channel. Maybe the reason is
> GFS. DLM works on the heartbeat channel. If you lost your heartbeat you lose
> your lock consistency so it is better to fence the other node. For this
> reason I th
Thanks for all the answers.
I think there is realy no backup heartbeat channel. Maybe the reason
is GFS. DLM works on the heartbeat channel. If you lost your heartbeat
you lose your lock consistency so it is better to fence the other
node. For this reason I think if you don't have enough ne
Hi All,
I've a problem with a clusterservice. The service was started up while one
of the resources, an NFS, export was not accessible.
Therefore the service never started up right but got into the 'recovering'
state.
In the mean time the NFS exports are setup properly but to no avail.
Stopping th
Hi,
I couldn´t reboot my system yet but I have installed the openmanage
packages:
srvadmin-omacore-5.4.0-260
srvadmin-iws-5.4.0-260
srvadmin-syscheck-5.4.0-260
srvadmin-rac5-components-5.4.0-260
srvadmin-deng-5.4.0-260
srvadmin-ipmi-5.4.0-260.DUP
srvadmin-racadm5-5.4.0-260
srvadmin-omauth-5.4.0-26
Hi,
I have a question about the qdisk concept.
My understanding of qdisk is that it is used as a tie-breaker, but it looks
like it is more a heatbeat vector than a simple tie-breaker.
My setup consists of 4 nodes located on 2 different production sites (2+2)
using SAN shared storage (2 disk frame
2009/8/13 Hakan VELIOGLU
> - raju.rajs...@gmail.com den ileti -
> Tarih: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:57:15 +0530
> Kimden: Rajagopal Swaminathan
> Yanıt Adresi:linux clustering
> Konu: Re: [Linux-cluster] Is there any backup heartbeat channel
> Kime: linux clustering
>
>
> Greeting
Hi,
I have a question about the qdisk concept.
My understanding of qdisk is that it is used as a tie-breaker, but it looks
like it is more a heatbeat vector than a simple tie-breaker.
My setup consists of 4 nodes located on 2 different production sites (2+2)
using SAN shared storage (2 disk fr
- raju.rajs...@gmail.com den ileti -
Tarih: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:57:15 +0530
Kimden: Rajagopal Swaminathan
Yanıt Adresi:linux clustering
Konu: Re: [Linux-cluster] Is there any backup heartbeat channel
Kime: linux clustering
Greetings,
2009/8/12 Hakan VELIOGLU :
Hi list
18 matches
Mail list logo
