Branimir wrote:
Hi list ;)
Well, here is my problem. I configured a few productions clusters myself
- mostly HP Proliant machines with ILO/ILO2. Now, I would like to do the
same thing but with ordinary PC hardware (the fact is my wife wants me
to reduce the number of my physical machines ;)). I
After sending this, I went back to debugging the problem. The
machines had stopped fencing and the DRBD link was down.
So first I stopped and then started 'xend' and this got the Xen-type
networking up. I left the machines alone for about ten minutes to see if
they would fence one another,
Hi all,
I've got CentOS 5.3 installed on two nodes (simple two node cluster).
On this, I've got a DRBD partition running cluster aware LVM. I use this
to host VMs under Xen.
I've got a problem where I am trying to use eth0 as a back channel
for the VMs on either node via a firewall VM. T
This sounds like a memory problem from the mail app or OS that runs into the
cluster software. Trace running memory heaps in the dump.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Allen Belletti wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As I've mentioned before, I'm running a two-node clustered mail server on
> GFS2 (with RHEL 5
Hi All,
As I've mentioned before, I'm running a two-node clustered mail server
on GFS2 (with RHEL 5.4) Nearly all of the time, everything works
great. However, going all the way back to GFS1 on RHEL 5.1 (I think it
was), I've had occasional locking problems that force a reboot of one or
bot
Hi,
We are still struggling with the problem of try_rgrp_unlink consuming large
amounts of CPU time over durations exceeding 15 minutes. We see several threads
on the same node repeatedly calling try_rgrp_unlink with the same rgrp and the
same group of inodes being retuned over and over until 15
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:33 -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:17 +0100, Bohdan Sydor wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My customer's goal is to run Progress OpenEdge 10.2A on RHEL 5.4. It
> > should be a HA service with two nodes and FC-connected shared storage.
> > I've reviewed the
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:17 +0100, Bohdan Sydor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My customer's goal is to run Progress OpenEdge 10.2A on RHEL 5.4. It
> should be a HA service with two nodes and FC-connected shared storage.
> I've reviewed the group archive and googled too, but didn't find
> anything suitable.
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 12:52 -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> FYI, this was fixed in March:
>
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=cluster.git;a=commit;h=aee97b180e80c9f8b90b8fca63004afe3b289962
>
> -- Lon
Ups, didn't notice that, I did look at the git log before opening the
bug but I must have mis
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:05 +, Martin Waite wrote:
> Hi Brem,
>
> Thanks for the pointers.
>
> The link to "OCF RA API Draft" appears to answer my questions. It will take
> a while to digest all that.
Note that rgmanager doesn't implement 'monitor' (uses 'status' instead)
as required by
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:24 +, Martin Waite wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This does look like the same problem:
>
> mar...@clusternode27:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/cman_tool -f nodes
> Node Sts Inc Joined Name
> 27 M 44 2009-10-27 14:59:33 clusternode27
> 28 M 52 2009-10-27
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 14:54 +0100, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:10:07 -
> "Martin Waite" wrote:
>
> > Given the nature of the bug, does this mean that the unpatched
> > cluster code is unable to relocate services in the event of node
> > failure ?
>
> Yes, that means exactly t
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 19:44 -0400, Madison Kelly wrote:
> You know, I've been wondering the same thing now for a little while and
> had figured it just wasn't possible. I had seen a design a couple of
> years ago for a serial to reset switch home-brew fence device but I've
> not been able to fi
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:36:30AM +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> as briefly mentioned in 3.0.4 release note, a new system to validate the
> configuration has been enabled in the code.
>
> What it does
>
>
> The general idea is to be able to perform as many sani
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:03:41 -0500, David Teigland wrote
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:13:04PM +0200, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
> > Hello,
> > i would like to have one specific node to always fence any other failed
> > node
> > and some nodes to never try to fence. For example in 4 or 5 nodes cluste
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:13:04PM +0200, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
> Hello,
> i would like to have one specific node to always fence any other failed node
> and some nodes to never try to fence. For example in 4 or 5 nodes cluster:
> Node1 is fencing any other failed, Node2 and Node3 will try fenci
16 matches
Mail list logo
