Just notice that, on a node it is using kernel version 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5.
Don't sure if the difference has any effect.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are using GFS2 on 3 nodes cluster, kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5,
> RHEL/CentOS5, x86_64 with 8-12GB
Hello,
We are using GFS2 on 3 nodes cluster, kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5,
RHEL/CentOS5, x86_64 with 8-12GB memory in each node. The underlying storage
is HP 2312fc smart array equipped with 12 SAS 15K rpm, configured as RAID10
using 10 HDDs + 2 spares. The array has about 4GB cache. Communication is
Hi,
in the file /var/lib/nfs/etabI get this:
/nfsdata
nodo1(rw,sync,wdelay,hide,nocrossmnt,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash,no_subtree_check,secure_locks,acl,fsid=45793,mapping=identity,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534)
the version of nfs are this:
nfs-utils-1.0.9-42.el5
nfs-utils-lib-1.0.8-7.6
Hi,
Did you set fsid= on the export? Which NFS version are you using?
Steve.
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 17:00 +0200, ESGLinux wrote:
> HI,
>
>
> look at the error that happens when two nodes are writing to the
> index:
>
>
> java.io.IOException: Stale NFS file handle
> at java.io.Random
HI,
look at the error that happens when two nodes are writing to the index:
java.io.IOException: Stale NFS file handle
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.writeBytes(Native Method)
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.write(RandomAccessFile.java:466)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.FSIndexOutp
Thanks Paras and Steve.
Yes the document you have mentioned , I already gone through it.
I experiented on cluster the httpd service and few other serverices.
And now , I am trying to build a GFS filesystem on which I will build the
xen guests. This file system is connected to three nodes. So m
We use Lucene over GFS (no NFS), but the design of our application updates
Lucene from only one node at a time.
In general applications that utilize POSIX locking can handle concurrent
updates safely on GFS even with multiple nodes. It wasn't clear to us whether
Lucene supports this, howeve
Hi All,
I´m mounting a cluster using NFS over GFS and I´m going to store a lucene
index on it.
There are two nodes that write in this index, and I´m worried about the
index corruption.
So anyone have implemented something like this? any problem I can find?
Thanks in advance,
ESG
--
Linux-clust
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The cluster team and its community are proud to announce the 3.0.11
stable release from the STABLE3 branch.
This release contains a few major bug fixes. We strongly recommend
people to update their clusters.
In order to build/run the 3.0.11 release y
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:41:42 +, "Joseph L. Casale"
wrote:
>>One of the problems with clustering is the fencing barrier to entry when
>>shared data is at stake -- often it's high cost and not all hardware
>>vendors resell them.
>
> I'm surprised more people don't just fence with a managed swit
10 matches
Mail list logo
