On 07/16/2010 06:18 AM, Martin Waite wrote:
Hi,
During testing, I noticed that a time step caused by ntpd caused the
cluster to drop into GATHER state:
Jun 16 12:13:16 cp1edidbm001 ntpd[30917]: time reset -16.332117 s
Jun 16 12:13:26 cp1edidbm001 openais[15929]: [TOTEM] entering GATHER
state f
Are you running Samba with CTDB on a cluster?
This question really belongs on the samba-technical mailing list since it
probably has more to do with Samba's state management than the underlying
cluster file system.
Chris -)-
Justin Shafer wrote:
> I have read this on the mailing list..
> htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a 4-node cluster, running KVM, and a host of VM's.
One of the nodes failed unexpectedly. I'm having two issues. First,
the VM's which were on that node are still reported as up and running on
that node in clustat, and second, i'm unable to in
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:11:38 +0100, "Martin Waite"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NTP has a step-threshold - if the time difference is greater than the
> threshold, it will step the time rather than speeding it up or down. So
> even using ntpd can cause clock steps (especially in our test
> environment where
Hi,
NTP has a step-threshold - if the time difference is greater than the
threshold, it will step the time rather than speeding it up or down. So
even using ntpd can cause clock steps (especially in our test
environment where our crappy overloaded NTP servers sometimes lose 30
seconds).
On some
Hi,
i can confirm, that time steps do cause reconfiguration. Not sure if this
was the reason, but one of my nodes was fenced from time to time
(previously) after several reconfigurations and also it caused some
problems with gfs being withdrawn.
ntpdate running as cron job does step changes, but
Also, Im not using the round-robin method for failover with DNS records, Im
using the LVS method. Don't think that matters And I don't know if
Corosync expects to use LVS or go off the public_addresses file as corosync
is supposed to take your ctdb file and reconfigure it.. Like should I have
c
Yep I agree. The failover itself is almost instant.. I too am running samba
ctdb in active/active with corosync/drbd/ocfs2.. though I haven't added ctdb
as a resource to corosync, I have just been starting it manually. Corosync
wants to know there the SMB private directory is and I was told by some
Hi,
During testing, I noticed that a time step caused by ntpd caused the
cluster to drop into GATHER state:
Jun 16 12:13:16 cp1edidbm001 ntpd[30917]: time reset -16.332117 s
Jun 16 12:13:26 cp1edidbm001 openais[15929]: [TOTEM] entering GATHER
state from 12.
Jun 16 12:13:26 cp1edidbm001 op
Hi Justin.
My understanding of all this is that SMB2 was only introduced with
Vista
(http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2008/12/05/smb2-a-complete-redesign-of-the-main-remote-file-protocol-for-windows.aspx)
and as a result your client has to be using SMB1
I was looking into SMBv4 for RHE
Hi,
I am trying to setup a Conga cluster on Redhat 5.4 and i am unable to start
the luci service.
Details:
[r...@rhel-n1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep luci
luci-0.12.2-6.el5
[r...@rhel-n1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep ricci
ricci-0.12.2-6.el5
When I start ricci service i get the following message in /var/log/messa
11 matches
Mail list logo
