Re: [Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

2011-03-13 Thread yue
1.thanks, i have 20-100 nodes. anyone knows how citrix does ? At 2011-03-14 00:21:40,"Thomas Sjolshagen" wrote: >I'm using gfs2 to host KVM vm image files for a pair of clustered hosts. Am >using iscsi targets for the vm data devices however as they are hosting imap >spools. No stabili

Re: [Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

2011-03-13 Thread Thomas Sjolshagen
I'm using gfs2 to host KVM vm image files for a pair of clustered hosts. Am using iscsi targets for the vm data devices however as they are hosting imap spools. No stability issues or performance problems I can readily or easily attribute to the gfs2 FS in my use case. // Thomas On Mar 13, 201

Re: [Linux-cluster] Two node cluster - a potential problem of node fencing each other?

2011-03-13 Thread Parvez Shaikh
redundant network link - i trust you were referring to ethernet bonding. On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Ian Hayes wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Parvez Shaikh > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have a question pertaining to two node cluster, I have RHEL 5.5 and >> cluster along with it

Re: [Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

2011-03-13 Thread yue
1.i need gfs2 or ocfs2 to store xen-disk image file(20G--100G),it is big file. the underlying storage is fc-san. both of them have cluster sence.so they fit for me. if gfs2 is ready for product? anyone use gfs2 in product? stability is the most important thing. 2.i have try gfs2 and ocfs2