On Monday 12 March 2012 18:40:36 Xavier Montagutelli wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2012 16:55:36 Jeff Sturm wrote:
> > Sure. As long as you don't try to make use of any LVM features that
> > require metadata consistency (mirroring, snapshots, online resizing, etc.)
> > you can get by using LVM with
On Friday 09 March 2012 16:55:36 Jeff Sturm wrote:
> Sure. As long as you don't try to make use of any LVM features that
> require metadata consistency (mirroring, snapshots, online resizing, etc.)
> you can get by using LVM without clustering.
Yes, particulary using the (relatively new) options
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:29:06 +0100 emmanuel segura wrote:
> i'll try to be more clear
> i work on redhat cluster from 2 years and i seen this topic so much times
Sorry, I didn't want to offend anyone.
I have been working on rhcs (and other companions from other OSes) for
many years too...
> I thin
